Dear Felix,
Just a quick comment on PANG Rui's response: It is true that those
approximations should be closer to the correct value, but at most only
about 20-25 %; this is how much Hartree-Fock exchange is mixed to the GGA
exchange. The correlation functional remains the same, so the "gain" might
be even smaller. And not to mention the HUGE computational effort one
would spend; in such cases plane wave basis set is not a good idea for an
isolated water molecule, better would be a code based on localised basis
sets.
Just my small note.
Greetings,
apsi
-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-
Ari Paavo Seitsonen / [email protected] / http://www.iki.fi/~apsi/
Ecole Normale Supérieure (ENS), Département de Chimie, Paris
Mobile (F) : +33 789 37 24 25 (CH) : +41 79 71 90 935
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, 庞瑞(PANG Rui) wrote:
Dear Felix
If I am correct, PBE contains self-interaction error, that means it may give a
wrong number when you use it to calculate a single electron system such as
hydrogen. Mayben you
could try B3LYP or HSE.
Best wishes
------------------
[viewfile?type=logo&domain=sustc.edu.cn]
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China/Department of Physics
No.1088,Xueyuan Road, Shenzhen,Guangdong
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Felix Brockherde"<[email protected]>;
Date: Fri, Feb 26, 2016 09:31 PM
To: "Pw_forum"<[email protected]>;
Subject: [Pw_forum] Binding Energy for H2O with PAW
Dear all,
We would like to calculate the binding energy for non-equilibrium H2O
geometries with PAW pseudo potentials.
The initial thought was to calculate the single-atom energies. However, for H
the system becomes metallic. We used smearing but the results seem too far from
the experimental
value for us to use them (-0.91784682 Ry).
Now, we would like to calculate the binding energy by separating the H2O
molecule as far as necessary. We would thus avoid inaccuracies caused by
smearing because it is not a
metallic system. However, when pulling H2O apart, the DFT calculations do not
converge.
Can anybody help with either how to get the separated H2O converged or a
different approach to get the binding energy with PAW pseudo potentials?
We used PWSCF v.5.1.1 and I attached an input file where QE does not converge.
Best regards,
Felix Brockherde
TU Berlin
&CONTROL
calculation = 'scf',
wfcdir = 'tmp',
pseudo_dir = '/home/user/pseudo_potentials',
tprnfor = .true.,
prefix = 'prefix',
tstress = .false.,
outdir = './',
wf_collect = .true.,
/
&SYSTEM
nat = 3,
ntyp = 2,
ecutwfc = 90,
ecutrho = 360,
celldm(1) = 30,
ibrav = 1,
/
&ELECTRONS
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
H 1.00794 H_pbe-kjpaw_psl.0.1.UPF
O 15.9994 O_pbe-kjpaw_psl.0.1.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS alat
O 0.5 0.3 0.5
H 0.5 0.7 0.3
H 0.5 0.7 0.7
K_POINTS automatic
1 1 1 0 0 0
_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
