Filippo, I would be very grateful if you could send me the files to swap! I think you are probably right that it is a curiosity exercise but I’d like to take a whack at it. There might be room in our budget to go for a card like the GTC 1080 down the road, which looks very cool indeed.
Best regards, Gunnar > On 12 May 2016, at 14:25, Filippo SPIGA <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On May 12, 2016, at 1:31 PM, Gunnar Palsson <[email protected]> wrote: >> Is there a workaround for the error I’m getting? > > I can pass you a couple of files to swap. Personally I believe it is just a > curiosity exercise and nothing great will come out from it but if you insist > it isfine for me :-) > > >> Also do you know if there is a plan to support the Maxwell architecture in >> the future? > > No, the focus will be supporting QE-GPU on Pascal. Future NVIDIA gaming cards > based on Pascal architecture will have a huge single precision perfemance (> > 5TFlops per card) and a decent double precision one as well (~1.4 TFlops). > All of this needs to be assessed and tested but it is going to be > substantially better than Maxwell-based cards for codes that need double > precision. > > Check on google about GTC 1080 for more details. I look forward to try it > myself! > > >> I’m thinking whether the performance might be improved by “switching the GPU >> to TCC mode” as explained in the link below. It seems like TCC mode is >> supported for QUADRO M5000. >> http://arrayfire.com/explaining-fp64-performance-on-gpus/ > > Never experimented with TCC mode. I suspect it is something that is possible > to use on GEFORCE and QUADRO products. On TESLA product line double precision > performance is sadisfactory per se. > > > -- > Mr. Filippo SPIGA, M.Sc. > Quantum ESPRESSO Foundation > http://www.quantum-espresso.org ~ skype: filippo.spiga > > ***** > Disclaimer: "Please note this message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL > and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. The contents > are not to be disclosed to anyone other than the addressee. Unauthorized > recipients are requested to preserve this confidentiality and to advise the > sender immediately of any error in transmission." > > > _______________________________________________ > Pw_forum mailing list > [email protected] > http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum _______________________________________________ Pw_forum mailing list [email protected] http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
