Dear Omamuyovwi Akemu,

Please try breaking the symmetry, even slightly, in the top-most layer; the symmetry analysis apparently does not take into account the fixed coordinates. So initially the code thinks that the two surfaces are identical, but after the relaxation only the top-most layer is moved, making it different by symmetry from the other surface. I usually displace the surface layer atoms vertically just so much that the possible symmetries along the surface normal are broken.

  Or maybe this is not your problem...

    Greetings from Paris,

       apsi

-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-
  Ari Paavo Seitsonen / [email protected] / http://www.iki.fi/~apsi/
    Ecole Normale Supérieure (ENS), Département de Chimie, Paris
    Mobile (F) : +33 789 37 24 25    (CH) : +41 79 71 90 935


On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, Omamuyovwi Akemu wrote:

Dear QE User,
 
I'm  having trouble trying to relax the (100) surface of Mo.
I will be grateful if someone can help or give me a hint on how to fix this 
problem.
Thanks you all.

Below is my input file:
&CONTROL
  calculation = "relax",
  prefix      = "Mo"
  pseudo_dir  = "/home/omamu/QE/espresso-5.0.1/pseudo",
  outdir      = "./tmp",
/
&SYSTEM
  ibrav       = 6,
  celldm(1)   = 5.952639665D0,
  celldm(3)   = 10.499999999D0,
  nat         = 15,
  ntyp        = 1,
  ecutwfc     = 32.D0,
  ecutrho     = 320.D0,
  occupations = "smearing",
  smearing    = "m-v",
  degauss     = 0.02D0,
/
&ELECTRONS
  conv_thr    = 1.D-8,
  mixing_beta = 0.3D0,
/
&IONS
  ion_dynamics   = 'bfgs'
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Mo  95.94  Mo.pw91-n-van.UPF

ATOMIC_POSITIONS
Mo   0.0000     0.0000     0.000   0  0  0
Mo   0.5000     0.5000     0.500   0  0  0
Mo   0.0000     0.0000     1.000   0  0  0
Mo   0.5000     0.5000     1.500   0  0  0
Mo   0.0000     0.0000     2.000   0  0  0
Mo   0.5000     0.5000     2.500   0  0  0
Mo   0.0000     0.0000     3.000   0  0  0
Mo   0.5000     0.5000     3.500   1  1  1
Mo   0.0000     0.0000     4.000   1  1  1
Mo   0.5000     0.5000     4.500   1  1  1
Mo   0.0000     0.0000     5.000   1  1  1
Mo   0.5000     0.5000     5.500   1  1  1
Mo   0.0000     0.0000     6.000   1  1  1
Mo   0.5000     0.5000     6.500   1  1  1
Mo   0.0000     0.0000     7.000   1  1  1

K_POINTS automatic
10  10   1   0  0  0

The error report is :
  BFGS Geometry Optimization

     number of scf cycles    =   1
     number of bfgs steps    =   0

     energy   new            =    -438.7514973224 Ry

     new trust radius        =       0.0549563359 bohr
     new conv_thr            =       0.0000000100 Ry


ATOMIC_POSITIONS (alat)
Mo       0.000000000   0.000000000   0.000000000    0   0   0
Mo       0.500000000   0.500000000   0.500000000    0   0   0
Mo       0.000000000   0.000000000   1.000000000    0   0   0
Mo       0.500000000   0.500000000   1.500000000    0   0   0
Mo       0.000000000   0.000000000   2.000000000    0   0   0
Mo       0.500000000   0.500000000   2.500000000    0   0   0
Mo       0.000000000   0.000000000   3.000000000    0   0   0
Mo       0.500000000   0.500000000   3.500000000
Mo       0.000000000   0.000000000   4.000135262
Mo       0.500000000   0.500000000   4.500756431
Mo       0.000000000   0.000000000   4.999615948
Mo       0.500000000   0.500000000   5.500355304
Mo       0.000000000   0.000000000   6.000329230
Mo       0.500000000   0.500000000   6.509232263
Mo       0.000000000   0.000000000   6.993885956



 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
     Error in routine checkallsym (1):
     some of the original symmetry operations not satisfied
       
Jolayemi Omamuyovwi Rita                                                        
                                                                    
?? ?                 
Research Student
University of Benin
Nigeria.


_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to