dear Muhammad Adnan Saqlain,

gamma extrapolation is a way to deal with the ill defined value of the exchange integral between wfcs at k and k+q in the limit of q->0. if you use a truncated coulomb interaction that limit is not ill defined.
   no need to use the gamma_extrapolation option
   best,
stefano

On 23/07/2016 10:00, Muhammad Adnan Saqlain wrote:
Dear Prof Clavijo
I am extremely sorry for my misleading title of the calculation. Actually, It was a cubic structure consisting of Cs, Pb and I. I deliberately did not put the atoms in the calculation. more over I do not know why the algorithm for cell movement was not copied it was however present in the input file.

1. If I try these two options, the

    vcut_spherical : appropriate for cubic and quasi-cubic supercells
    vcut_ws : appropriate for strongly anisotropic supercells, see also
               ecutvcut.

the program says like this

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
     Error in routine  system_checkin (1):
      x_gamma_extrapolation cannot be used with vcut
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

I have no idea how to fix it. Can you suggest one??

2. I have now used Q-E 5.4.0, but this version does not allow vc-relax option with hybrid one. why is it so? How would the band gap be effected if I relax the cell without hybrid scheme and then calculate band gap with hybrid one?

3. About the ecutoff, I deliberately used small one as these are just calculations not the real one. 4. I have cubic system, may I try q-grid like 1*2*3 or it has to be symmetric one?
 5. Can you suggest more about hybrid calculations?


On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Josue Itsman Clavijo Penagos <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Dear, Muhammad Adnan Saqlain, remember the user documentation for
    *exxdiv_treatment*:

        Specific for EXX. It selects the kind of approach to be used
        for treating the Coulomb potential divergencies at small q vectors.

        gygi-baldereschi : appropriate for cubic and*quasi-cubic supercells*
        vcut_spherical : appropriate for cubic and quasi-cubic supercells
        vcut_ws : appropriate for strongly anisotropic supercells, see also
                   ecutvcut.
        none : sets Coulomb potential at G,q=0 to 0.0 (required for GAU-PBE)

    *Besides that, *I**have some observations and suggestions for you
    based in the input file you send, so you can realize why does QE
    is failing when trying to simulate your system:

    1 - Check if you really need to apply smearing, since this
    technique is intended to be useful for metallic systems, and
    Anatase is cleary not a metallic system, in fact, is more a
    Wide-gap or Insulator -type system.

    2 - You do want to perform a vc-relax calculation, but nothing are
    specified in the cards &IONS and &CELL. There is not cell relaxing
    algorithm specified (BFGS? MD?)

    3 - The card &ATOMIC_POSITIONS shows nothing: No atoms, no cell to
    relax.

    4 - In the card &SYSTEM , *ecutwfc = 40.* This, in my humble
    opinion, a very poor cutoff for a serious calculation. Do
    a ecutwfc convergence test before attempt your system.

    5 - Please take in account that a hybrid calculation is VERY
    expensive in terms of computational demand, so if you set up a
    vc-relax calculation using hybrid PPS you must test if *nqx1 = 1,
    2 or 3 really makes a difference.*
    *
    *
    *6 - For some systems, input_dft=HSE is faster than **input_dft =
    "PBE0". Check if that could be your case.*
    *
    *
    By the way, are you sure Anatase has a cubic crystal structure?
    Does XCrysden show the correct structure for your input?

    *Best regards, *
    *
    *

    Josué Clavijo, PhD.
    Assistant Professor
    Universidad Nacional de Colombia
    Departamento de Química

    _______________________________________________
    Pw_forum mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum




--
Best Regards
Muhammad Adnan Saqlain



_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum


_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to