Dear Prem,

Please do not forget to write your affiliation.


> Dear All,
> I am a new user of QE and interested to calculate the optical absorption 
> spectra in atomic level using > TDDFT code. I have checked the ecut & 
> ecutfock convergence and also relaxed the structure. I can understand so far 
> what is going on. But when I am running turbo_lanczos.x and turbo_davidson.x, 
> I am getting output but how can I check that my calculation is correct ??

There is a reference data provided with the examples for the TDDFPT package.

You may compare your converged spectra with the experimental ones and with 
other theoretical spectra in the literature.

> After running turbo_davidson.x, I am getting a file named as "CH4.plot". If I 
> am plotting it using xmgrace, it is showing the x-axis in Ry scale but that I 
> want in eV ??

If you use turbo_davidson.x, plot the second column of CH4.plot (labeled as 
"total", oscillator strength S(E)) as a function of the first column (energy E 
in Ry). In xmgrace you can easily do a rescaling of the axes: in your case just 
make a conversion of the energy from Ry to eV by multiplying by 13.6.

If you use turbo_lanczos.x, you will obtain a file "CH4.plot_chi.dat". This 
file contains an information about the dipole polarizability tensor (chi_i_j) 
and about the oscillator strength S(E) which is: S(E) ~  E * sum_i Im[ 
chi_i_i(E) ]. Extract the oscillator strength "S(E)" from this file using the 
grep command, and then plot S(E) as a function of E which is the absorption 
spectrum.

The two codes (Lanczos and Davidson) must give you the same absorption spectrum 
(when both are converged). More details can be found in this paper: X. Ge et 
al., Computer Physics Communications, 185, 2080 (2014).

> Thanks,
> Prem

HTH

Regards,
Iurii

--
Dr. Iurii Timrov
Postdoctoral Researcher
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)
Laboratory of Theory and Simulation of Materials (THEOS)
Lausanne, Switzerland

_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to