Dear Mohammed,

once you compute the projected k-resolved DOS (projwfc.x, Wannier90, you name 
it...) the “procedure” has very little to do with Quantum Espresso  and much 
more with theory of topological insulators.
Hence, I suggest you to give a look at some review papers on the subject and 
spend some time on them. A good recent one is 
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.88.021004 (have a look at Fig.1 for 
instance, it is quite clear) but there are many others.
The band inversion is literally an inversion of the character of bands (e.g. an 
s-band and a p-band, or a p-band and a d-band, ...), that happens in a small 
region in k-space. So you have two bands crossing each other with well defined 
orbital character and in a small region of k-space (for instance around the 
Gamma point) one of the two band (for instance an s-band) gets the character of 
the other band (e.g. p-band) and viceversa (Fig. 1 is quite perspicuous). 
Actually, you can have band inversion even without spin-orbit coupling; however 
SOC is quite fundamental to open a gap.

HTH


Antimo Marrazzo
Doctoral Assistant
EPFL STI IMX THEOS
ME-D2 1019 (Bâtiment ME)
Station 9
CH-1015 Lausanne (Switzerland)

Il giorno 21 gen 2017, alle ore 11:27, Mohammed Ghadiyali 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> ha scritto:

Hi All,

I 'm working on band structure of stanene - with and with spin orbit coupling 
(SOC). I have been able to replicate the

results but I 'm not getting how should I detect the band inversion due to SOC. 
I have performed the k resolved DOS

for the same, but I am not to determine any thing conclusive.

In short, can some one inform me procedure of finding if there is a band 
inversion in the band structure due to SOC or not.

Regards,
Ghadiyali Mohammed Kader
University of Mumbai.
_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to