Hi Pascal,

     When I first started using QE 6.0 not long ago I had trouble using 
crystal_sg, I suppose you have the Wyckoff positions of your atoms. What I did 
was use the VESTA program which allows you to input Wyckoff positions and it 
will correctly generate the cell as long as other options are correct. I then 
exported to an xyz file and converted the coordinates in angstroms to internal 
crystal coordinates ('crystal' option) using:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_coordinates

Fractional coordinates - 
Wikipedia<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_coordinates>
en.wikipedia.org
In crystallography, a fractional coordinate system is a coordinate system in 
which the edges of the unit cell are used as the basic vectors to describe the 
positions ...


Which worked perfectly for me. This is easily done with a Python script or 
something similar!


Kindest regards,

Louis

________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of 
Pascal Boulet <[email protected]>
Sent: 23 February 2017 07:56:16
To: PWSCF Forum
Subject: [Pw_forum] Symmetry recognition

Dear all,

I am running a structural optimization with QE 6.0. The structure is 
orthorhombic, ibrav=8, with 8 symmetry elements. The first run did not converge 
so I have to restart it. But as I restart it, the number of symmetry is now 4, 
there is a descent of symmetry. I shall say that I use the space_group option 
with COORDINATES crystal_sg. But the problem remains if I put all the 
coordinates (unsurprisingly).

Is there a reason for this, and can I avoid this?

Thank you
Best regards
Pascal

-
Pascal Boulet - MCF HDR, Resp. L2 MPCI - DEPARTEMENT CHIMIE
Aix-Marseille Université - ST JEROME - Avenue Escadrille Normandie Niemen - 
13013 Marseille
Tél: +33(0)4 13 55 18 10 - Fax : +33(0)4 13 55 18 50
Site : 
http://madirel.univ-amu.fr/pages_web_BOULET_PASCAL/annuaire<http://amu.fr/pages_web_BOULET_PASCAL/annuaire>
 - Email : [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>




_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to