Dear Josue,

Thank you for your answer. If I may, Ill answer point by point.

Concerning the representation of the system in XCrysden. I am using crystal_sg 
to specify the coordinates, indicating the appropriate space_group. When I open 
the output file of a converged scf with XCrysden, the cell contains the atoms 
as the original cif files. The only difference is that when I try to switch the 
Unit of Repetition from Unit Cell to translational asymmetric unit, nothing 
changes and the atoms outside the unit cell do not appear in the interior. I 
assumed this had to do with the fact that I'm reading the output; Is there 
something wrong in this?

Concerning the type of calculation. I want to compute phonon dispersion at the 
gamma point. That is why I am using norm-conserving pseudopotentials. And in a 
first approach I do not want to change the cell parameters, only to relax the 
atomic coordinates in the unit cell. So yes, I would stick to 'relax' 
calculation.

The system contains a lanthanide atom, which might be the cause for the 
behaviour different from the standard cases. Is there any particular keyword I 
could play with to affect the convergence of the total forces?

Cheers

========================

Dr. Daniel Reta,
Post-doctoral Research Associate,
Computational Chemistry, School of Chemistry
University of Manchester

Email: [email protected]

========================

________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of 
Josue Itsman Clavijo Penagos [[email protected]]
Sent: 24 April 2017 16:41
To: PWSCF Forum
Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] Total forces not converging: relax calculation

Dear Daniel,

It would be more useful if you post the input file you're using, or at least 
the atomic coordinates. Also, check if the system is well represented by the 
coordinates you are intending to relax, since a well-defined system usually 
converges at E_cutoff values as low as 60 Ryd for simple SCF calculations.  
(Does he system look as you expect when viewed in XCrysden, for example?) , 
unless you include rather demanding features like spin polarization, electric 
fields, defects and so on. By the way, Are norm-conserving PP's the only 
choice?(how about Ultrasoft?)

Moreover, what type of relax calculation do you want to study? judging by the 
info you sent, it is 'relax', but, Wouldn't be that your system need some cell 
parameters/angles relaxing (vc-relax), not just atomic coordinates one?

Best regards,


Prof. Josué Clavijo, PhD
Cristiano, born again

Assistant Professor
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Sede Bogotá


_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to