Users of this forum are usually kindly requested to provide their name and 
affiliation, when posting messages!!!!!!!!  ;-)

The scf run reads the position in the input file, whichever run has come 
before. nscf read positions from outdir, if any

Giovanni

> On 19 Jun 2017, at 12:14, Ubaid Mohd <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Then only for scf run, following the relaxation run, whether we use initial 
> coordinates or optimized coordinates
> 
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Giovanni Cantele 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Users of this forum are usually kindly requested to provide their name and 
> affiliation, when posting messages!  ;-)
> 
> If, after a relaxation run, you execute an nscf (e.g. for band structure or 
> DOS ) calculation, the code will automatically read optimised positions from 
> outdir, even though the input file contains the initial coordinates. On the 
> other hand, for an scf run, following a relaxation run, even though the 
> outdir contains information about the relaxed coordinates, pw.x will always 
> use the positions specified in the input file (you might want to calculate 
> total energy and other properties at geometries other than the relaxed one).
> 
> Giovanni
> 
> 
> > On 19 Jun 2017, at 09:58, Ubaid Mohd <[email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> > I have run some relaxed calculations. In case of scf /nscf/band 
> > calculations what coordinates should I be use, optimized coordinates from 
> > relaxed output file or by default it takes from prefix
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pw_forum mailing list
> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> > http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum 
> > <http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum 
> <http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to