It means you started with a magnetic trial solution and at the end of the vc-relaxation the final configuration is not magnetic. Is this correct or an artifact of the relaxation history ? To understand this the code performs a new scf calculation in the final configuration starting from scratch with the original starting_magnetization. Does the magnetization vanish again and the relaxation was correct or is it finite and one should continue the relaxation ? only you knows the answer to this question.

stefano

On 21/06/2017 22:10, Manu Hegde wrote:
Okay, thanks. How to avoid that statement?. Which means structure is non-magnetic?



On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 4:04 PM, stefano de gironcoli <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    this is not an error, it's a statement of what the code does and why.
    stefano


    On 21/06/2017 22:01, Manu Hegde wrote:

    Hello,

    I was performing 'vc-relax' calculation (LSDA) i found this
    message after few cycles. After performing scf calculaion run
    stopped. (using QE 5.4)


     lsda relaxation :  a final configuration with zero
                            absolute magnetization has been found

         the program is checking if it is really the minimum energy
    structure
         by performing a new scf iteration without any "electronic"
    history


    Thanks
    Manu Hegde

    (PDF, University of Waterloo)




    _______________________________________________
    Pw_forum mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
    <http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum>



    _______________________________________________
    Pw_forum mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
    <http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum>




_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum


_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to