I appreciate the help. If ESM does not require this symmetry, can you explain what is meant by the manual's statement of:

:

"Requires cell with a_3 lattice vector along z,

normal to the xy plane, with the slab centered around z=0. Also requires 
symmetry checking to be
disabled along z, either by settingnosym <http://www.quantum-espresso.org/wp-content/uploads/Doc/INPUT_PW.html#nosym> = .TRUE.
     or by very slight displacement (i.e., 5e-4 a.u.)
     of the slab along z."


I want to make sure I am in compliance with the manual's specifications, and I clearly must not understand what that means if I misinterpreted it to mean it requires symmetry along the z axis.


Separately, given that we have no symmetry in xy, is it logically necessary to "cap" boundary atoms with hydrogens (or the like) to avoid artifacts at the boundary?


On 7/28/17 6:41 PM, 大谷実 wrote:
Dear Robert,

Besides Lorenzo’s message, I can add one more thing. ESM does not require symmetry along z-axis, so you do not need to put an additional adsorbate molecule on the bottom.

    Also requires symmetry checking to be
          disabled along z, either by settingnosym
    
<http://www.quantum-espresso.org/wp-content/uploads/Doc/INPUT_PW.html#nosym>  = 
.TRUE.
          or by very slight displacement (i.e., 5e-4 a.u.)
          of the slab along z.



Best regard,
Minoru
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minoru Otani
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
Research Centre for Computational Design of Advanced Functional Materials
email : [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Jul 29, 2017, at 5:15, Lorenzo Paulatto <[email protected]> wrote:

It does not matter, it is only need to be roughly centered

--
Lorenzo Paulatto
Written on a virtual keyboard with real fingers

On 28 Jul 2017 9:36 p.m., "Dr. Robert Molt Jr." <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Good evening,

    I am confused by the "centering" requirements of ESM. It is
    stated that:

    Requires cell with a_3 lattice vector along z,
          normal to the xy plane, with the slab centered
          around z=0. Also requires symmetry checking to be
          disabled along z, either by settingnosym
    
<http://www.quantum-espresso.org/wp-content/uploads/Doc/INPUT_PW.html#nosym>  = 
.TRUE.
          or by very slight displacement (i.e., 5e-4 a.u.)
          of the slab along z.

    I have constructed a slab which is symmetric about the xy plane
    and centered around z=0 contour. This is fine and good.

    However, once I add the adsorbate molecule, I cannot have
    symmetry...unless it is intended that I add the same adsorbate
    molecule on the "bottom" of the simulation, too? I am unclear
    what is meant by the slab being "centered." Center of mass?
    Center of symmetry?



    _______________________________________________
    Pw_forum mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
    <http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum>

_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum



_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to