Yes,

as I wrote, they are generate with the same input files as the official SG15-ONCV pseudopotentials, but using a more recent version of the oncv software that also writes the atomic wavefunctions in the file. These wavefunctions are required to do a +U calculation, and can also improve convergence as they allow the calculation to be started from atomic wfcs.



On 20/08/17 06:41, Tan Hengxin wrote:
Dear Dr. Lorenzo,

I didn't know that the original SG15_ONCV PPs don't have the capability with Hubbard U. I really thank you very much for your useful information! This helps me much. And, are the PPs in the link you sent me generated by you that have the orbital wavefunction ?

Best regards,
Hengxin

On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Lorenzo Paulatto <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Dear Tan,

    the sg15-ONCV pseudoptentials that you can download do not have
    the atomic wavefunctions in the UPF file. However, you can easily
    reconstruct them from the input files (available online) with the
    most recent version of the oncv code, which will indeed include
    the atomic wavefunctions.

    Some time ago I did this for all the elements in the database. *I
    did not check that the resulting files are actually identical
    except for the atomic wavefunctions) to those in original SG15
    database, I'll let you do this for Oxygen and Zinc.*

    You can get the archive here:

    https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bzgwv8VZEl9ST1BEWEEzNFNSbTA
    <https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bzgwv8VZEl9ST1BEWEEzNFNSbTA>

    or, if it is blocked in China, I hope from here:

    https://mega.nz/#!kr52HKTb
    <https://mega.nz/#%21kr52HKTb>!DTgLxy5zh-TZZQb-Ar0cpkEeHvpFSrsv331kDyCcIOY


    hth





    On 18/08/17 10:13, Tan Hengxin wrote:
    Dear All,

    When I perform Hubbard U correction for Zn in ZnO, the run
crashes. The error message says "from offset_atom_wfc : error # 1 wrong offset". I searched the forum, finding that this
    may because the Zn psp was generated with zero d-orbital
    occupation. But obviously this should bot be the case for Zn psp,
    since it's not reasonable to remove all the 10 d electrons in any
    Zn psp generation. So in my Zn psp, the d orbital is of course
    occupied. But it still crashes.

    Could someone give me some ideas on this? Any suggestions will be
    highly appreciated.
    My psps are from the sg15_ONCV and attached below. The input file
    is also attached.

    Regards,
    Hengxin
    THU
-- Tan Hengxin
    Department of physics, THU.
    Beijing 100084, China
    Office: B403,New Science Building
    E-mail:t <mailto:e-mail%[email protected]>[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>


    _______________________________________________
    Pw_forum mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
    <http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum>

-- Dr. Lorenzo Paulatto
    IdR @ IMPMC -- CNRS & Université Paris 6
    phone: +33 (0)1 442 79822 / skype: paulatz
    www:http://www-int.impmc.upmc.fr/~paulatto/
    <http://www-int.impmc.upmc.fr/%7Epaulatto/>
    mail:  23-24/423 Boîte courrier 115, 4 place Jussieu 75252 Paris Cédex 05


    _______________________________________________
    Pw_forum mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
    <http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum>




--
Tan Hengxin
Department of physics, THU.
Beijing 100084, China
Office: B403,New Science Building
E-mail:t <mailto:e-mail%[email protected]>[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>


_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

--
Dr. Lorenzo Paulatto
IdR @ IMPMC -- CNRS & Université Paris 6
phone: +33 (0)1 442 79822 / skype: paulatz
www:   http://www-int.impmc.upmc.fr/~paulatto/
mail:  23-24/423 Boîte courrier 115, 4 place Jussieu 75252 Paris Cédex 05

_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to