On 06/09/17 21:01, Lance Kavalsky wrote:
> I am no longer getting the error after increasing the energy cutoff of
> the wavefunctions to 250.0 Ry, decreasing the smearing to 0.01, and
> resetting the diagonalization back to davidson.
You mean of the charge density cutoff?
> I have experimented with varying the starting magnetizations and it
> consistently converges to a non-magnetic state. However, M. Kan et al.
> showed that a ferromagnetic state should exist via DFT (J. Phys. Chem.
> Lett., *2013*, /4/ (20), pp 3382–3386). Is this lack of magnetic states
> in my investigations more likely a result of not yet discovering a
> suitable starting magnetization, or could there be another reason such
> as choice of pseudopotentials?
>
I do not know your system, but you may have to start with to different
species of Mg, in order to break symmetry. This is necessary if one of
the symmetries of your crystal send Mg1 to Mg2 changing its orientation.
Example:
nat=4, ntyp=3,
...
starting_magnetization(1)=0.5 !Mn1
starting_magnetization(2)=0.5 !Mn2
starting_magnetization(3)=-0.5 !Oxygen
...
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Mn1 54.9380 Mn.pbe-spn-kjpaw_psl.0.3.1.upf
Mn2 54.9380 Mn.pbe-spn-kjpaw_psl.0.3.1.upf
O 15.9994 O.pbe-n-kjpaw_psl.0.1.upf
ATOMIC_POSITIONS {angstrom}
Mn1 1.463698094 2.529784343 0.000006382
Mn2 2.923484801 0.001355102 1.898036230
O 0.003938199 1.686984261 0.949009435
O 1.463753969 0.844151693 2.847056902
[resending to list]
--
Dr. Lorenzo Paulatto
IdR @ IMPMC -- CNRS & Université Paris 6
phone: +33 (0)1 442 79822 / skype: paulatz
www: http://www-int.impmc.upmc.fr/~paulatto/
mail: 23-24/423 Boîte courrier 115, 4 place Jussieu 75252 Paris Cédex 05
_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
