Dear QE developers,

Here I am reporting a big bug in Quantum Espresso. QE 6.1 and 5.1 yield 
completely different pdos for a simple CO molecule. The results from QE 5.1 are 
completely wrong, because 2px and 2py associated with 1pi orbitals should not 
be splitted into three levels. These outcomes are impossible for DFT 
calculations. The results from QE 6.1 is also unsatisfying;the 2pz states 
should not be populated at a deep level below -28 eV? 


Best


Jibiao Li


Yangtze Normal Univeristy, China


CO.pw.inp


 &CONTROL
                 calculation = 'scf' ,
                restart_mode = 'from_scratch' ,
                      outdir = '/home/jibiao/Calc/CO_Fe100/T/' ,
                  pseudo_dir = '/home/jibiao/Codes/pseudo/' ,
                      prefix = 'CO' ,
                     tstress = .true. ,
                     tprnfor = .true. ,
 /
 &SYSTEM
                       ibrav = 6,
                   celldm(1) = 10.847032278,
                   celldm(3) = 3.28,
                         nat = 2,
                        ntyp = 2,
                     ecutwfc = 29 ,
                     ecutrho = 180 ,
                 occupations = 'smearing' ,
                     degauss = 0.05D0 ,
                    smearing = 'methfessel-paxton' ,
            exxdiv_treatment = 'gygi-baldereschi' ,
 /
 &ELECTRONS
                 mixing_beta = 0.2D0 ,
             diagonalization = 'david' ,
 /
ATOMIC_SPECIES
    C   12.01000  C.pbe-van_ak.UPF 
    O   15.99900  O.pbe-van_ak.UPF 
ATOMIC_POSITIONS angstrom 
    C      2.870000002    2.869999976    7.634009081    
    O      2.870000022    2.869999989    8.812254230    
K_POINTS automatic 
  4 4 1   0 0 0 



CO.projwfc.in


 &PROJWFC
                      prefix = 'CO' ,
                      outdir = '/home/jibiao/Calc/CO_Fe100/T/' ,
                      ngauss = 0 ,
                     degauss = 0.01470 ,
                      DeltaE = 0.02 ,
 /
_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to