Dear Chris,

You are right, the version of the Environ plugin that was on the website 
(release 0.2, released in 2016) was not compatible with the new version of QE, 
due to some recent changes in the FFT derived data types. Together with the 
other developers of Environ, we have patched Environ-0.2 in order to be still 
compatible with the new release of QE.


I have just uploaded the new archive (Environ-0.2_for_QE-6.2.tgz) on the 
QE-Forge portal, http://qe-forge.org/gf/project/electroemb/frs/. I also renamed 
the previous archive to reflect the fact that it is only compatible with QE 
versions from 5.3.0 to 6.1.0, included. Please let me know if you have any 
problem with the new version of the library, at compilation or at run time.


Thank you for you time and sorry again for the inconvenience.


Best regards,


Oliviero Andreussi

--
Senior Postdoctoral Researcher
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) and
Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI) of Lugano
USI Campus, Via G. Buffi 17, 6904 Lugano, Switzerland
Emails: oliviero.andreussi @ epfl.ch -or- usi.ch
Tel: +41-(0)58-666-4810 / Skype: olivieroandreussi

Web: https://sites.google.com/site/olivieroandreussi

________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of 
MUIR,Christopher <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 7:45:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Pw_forum] QE 6.2 + Environ 0.2

Hi everyone,
I have been attempting to assist one of our researchers in using QE with 
environ.
I’ve successfully compiled QE 6.2 using the following:
Intel compiler 17.0.2
Intel MPI 2.174
Intel MKL 2.174
And used the following:

./configure --enable-environment --enable-parallel --with-scalapack=intel 
FFT_LIBS="-L$MKLROOT/lib/intel64 -lmkl_intel_lp64 -lmkl_sequential -lmkl_core"
This seems to work fine but when I try to install Environ, the patches seem to 
run fine and all the necessary files seem to have been generated and modified.
Attempts to compile pw.x with environ lead to the following error:

mpif90 -O2 -assume byterecl -g -traceback -nomodule -fpp -D__ENVIRONMENT 
-D__DFTI -D__MPI -D__SCALAPACK  -I/home/cmuir/qe-6.2//include 
-I/home/cmuir/qe-6.2//FoX/finclude -I../include/ 
-I/cm/shared/apps/intel/compilers_and_libraries/2017.2.174/mkl/include 
-I../../iotk/src -I../../Modules -I../../FFTXlib -I../../LAXlib 
-I../../UtilXlib -I../../KS_Solvers/Davidson -I../../KS_Solvers/CG -c 
plugin_initbase.f90
plugin_initbase.f90(30): error #6460: This is not a field name that is defined 
in the encompassing structure.   [NPP]
  ir_end = MIN(dfftp%nnr,dfftp%nr1x*dfftp%nr2x*dfftp%npp(me_bgrp+1))
-----------------------------------------------------^
plugin_initbase.f90(30): error #6158: The structure-name is invalid or is 
missing.   [DFFTP]
  ir_end = MIN(dfftp%nnr,dfftp%nr1x*dfftp%nr2x*dfftp%npp(me_bgrp+1))
-----------------------------------------------^
compilation aborted for plugin_initbase.f90 (code 1)
Not a fortran programmer but it’s looking like the dfftp and npp variables were 
not imported into plugin_initbase.f90

Can anyone assist?

Thanks
Chris
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Christopher Muir
Information Technology Officer
Mona Information Technology Services
The University of the West Indies
Mona Campus
Jamaica, W.I.
T: 876-977-1785
E: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

CONFIDENTIALITY: This email (including any attachments) may contain 
confidential, proprietary and/or privileged information. Any duplication, 
copying, distribution, dissemination, transmission, disclosure or use in any 
manner of this email (including any attachments) without the authorisation of 
the sender is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email (including any 
attachments) in error, please notify the sender and delete this email 
(including any attachments) from your system. Thank you.


_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to