Dear Pascal, Dear Stefano, dear all

In a symetric system where two reactions A1->B1 and A2->B2 go trough the same 
saddle point, following the eigen vector responssible in each NEB is quite easy.
For example in NEB 1, here I plot the number of "negative" frequencies as a 
function of the path/15 steps
1      0      state A1
2      0
3      0
4      -1   inflexion point on the E({Ri}) curve
5      -1  This "negative" frequency w1 with eigen vector V1 is the one 
responsible of the transition A1->B1
6      -1
7     -2    here appear the frequency w2 responsible of the transition A2->B2
8     -2    saddle point that is a 2 dimension saddle in a 3Nat dimension space.
9     -2
10   -1
11   -1
12   -1  inflexion point on the E({Ri}) curve
13    0
14    0
15    0   state B1

the same for NEB2 by exchanging w1 and w2.
The two paths are separeted by high energy barriers that is always higher than 
the DeltaE of the saddle point except at the saddle point where this barrier is 
null.
Not that in this example I give 4 potential wells link together through the 
same saddle point (the reaction A1->A2 is also possible),
but it is mathematically possible to have even more potential wells as we are 
in a 3Nat dimension space.

For Stefano, the state 8 mathematically exists and is physically due to a high 
symmetry point, so I do not see why I should look for another saddle point.
NEB raffinement is un precise in this "plateau region".

For Pascal, following eigen vector V1 from the saddle point give me B1 (or A1 
as a function of the sign of the imposed displacement) and following V2 give me 
B2 (or A2),
but the problem is to know the transition rate from the Delta E and the 
omega_i, I already know which eigen vector correspond to which path...


Antoine Jay



On Monday, November 13, 2017 20:27 CET, degironc <[email protected]> wrote:
  I think that if there are two unstable directions at the saddle point this 
means there is another saddle point with a lower Activation energy nearby. Just 
slide the neb downhill stefano   Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. 
-------- Original message --------From: Pascal Boulet 
<[email protected]>Date: 13/11/2017 19:45 (GMT+01:00)To: PWSCF Forum 
<[email protected]>Subject: *spam*Re: [Pw_forum] Physical meaning of two 
imaginary phonon frequencies at NEB saddle point and Transition State Theory 
Hello, My guess: you have to remove one of the imaginary frequencies (most 
probably the smallest one) by following the corresponding eigenvector (=moving 
the atoms accordingly). Then, you will have to make sure that the transition 
state connects the reactants and products you are interested in. HTH,Pascal 
Pascal Boulet—Professor in computational chemistry - DEPARTEMENT OF 
CHEMISTRYAix-Marseille University - ST JEROME - Avenue Escadrille Normandie 
Niemen - F-13013 Marseille - FRANCETél: +33(0)4 13 55 18 10 - Fax : +33(0)4 13 
55 18 50Site : http://madirel.univ-amu.fr/pages_web_BOULET_PASCAL/infos - Email 
: [email protected]   Le 13 nov. 2017 à 12:44, JAY Antoine 
<[email protected]> a écrit : Dear all,
I have been using NEB to obtain the Delta E and phonon DOS at 
begining/end/saddle point to properly evaluate the vibrationnal entropy 
contribution in the transition state theory.
Commonly, one frequency in "negative" at the saddle point, the one that is 
"responssible" of the transition and the following of its eigen vector from the 
initial state give the minimum energy path.
However, when two phonon frequencies are "negatives" at the saddle point, that 
means that at least 3  energy minima are link together to the same saddle point.
The transition state theory cannot be applied there as the preexponential term 
is the ratio of the 3N-3 phonon frequencies of initial state over the 3N-4 
frequencies of the saddle point, giving the dimension of a time (state life 
time)
Using 3N-5 frequencies without the two negatives ones would not have a physical 
meaning for the initial partition function.

Any idea on how to treat such a problem to evaluate the transition rate would 
be appreciated.

Best regards.

Antoine Jay _______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum


 
_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to