Hi, if you want to study a nanowire, I do not see the reason why to optimise 
the unit cell along x and y directions.
Either freeze these two degrees of freedom in vc-relax or, much simpler, change 
c parameter (lattice parameter along the z direction)
and evaluate E(c) (total energy as a function of c). A parabolic fit will help 
you in finding the lowest energy configuration.

Generally speaking, to establish whether the vacuum is enough, calculate in at 
least one case the property you are interested in for two different
values of the vacuum and see if any appreciable change is observed. Another 
check is that the band structure should be flat (no dispersion)
along x and y

Giovanni



> On 29 Nov 2017, at 06:28, Anik Mondol <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Dear Users,
> I am doing a DFT calculation of GaN nanowires, While designing the nanowire 
> (approximately 10 A diameter) , I had added around 10 A of vacuum on x and y 
> direction. Now I have performed a vc-relax calculation before band 
> calculation, the cell volume has shrunk . The vacuum has decreased . Now to 
> make sure the results don't be affected by the identical replicas , at least  
> how much vacuum is needed ? Now, that the vacuum has shrunk, will that impose 
> any effect on results in this respects. I mean, How can I be sure this vacuum 
> is enough?
> 
> Mondol Anik Kumar 
> Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology 
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

-- 

Giovanni Cantele, PhD
CNR-SPIN
c/o Dipartimento di Fisica
Universita' di Napoli "Federico II"
Complesso Universitario M. S. Angelo - Ed. 6
Via Cintia, I-80126, Napoli, Italy
e-mail: [email protected]
Phone: +39 081 676910
Skype contact: giocan74

ResearcherID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-1951-2009
Web page: http://people.fisica.unina.it/~cantele

_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to