Dear Ali

If you use the current development version of qe your  input will work.

You are probably  using the 6.2.1 version and in that version there was a bug in reading the augmentation part of pseudopotentials generated using the uspp code. Previously all those files were in a different format and we were unaware of the bug.
After I converted all of them in the QE site the bug was  fixed it.

You can download the development version and run with it

or download the old versions of the UPF files from these links and use them with the 6.2.1 version. They should work

https://send.firefox.com/download/b9cbbcd533/#4AmeG8_GN5niui0eAYifhQ

https://send.firefox.com/download/921a9659b9/#f-5bDhOGfyMI682HM3zBHg

sorry for the inconvenience, regards   - Pietro


On 04/27/2018 05:05 AM, Ali Kamrani wrote:
Dear QE users,

My final goal is to obtain phonon dispersion of Ti3C2, however at the very beginning I get the following error:

Error in scalartorealdp
Too few elements found

Here is my input:

&control
 calculation='vc-relax',
 restart_mode='from_scratch',
 pseudo_dir = '.',
 tprnfor=.true.,
 forc_conv_thr= 1.0d-7,
 etot_conv_thr= 1.0d-8,
/
&system
 ibrav = 0,
 nat=  5,
 ntyp= 2,
 ecutwfc = 70,
 ecutrho = 630,
 occupations= 'smearing',
 smearing= 'mp',
 degauss = 0.01,
/
&electrons
 diagonalization= 'cg',
 conv_thr =  1.0d-12,
/
&ions
 ion_dynamics = 'bfgs',
/
&cell
 cell_dynamics = 'bfgs',
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
 C  12.01  C.pz-van_ak.UPF
 Ti 47.867 Ti.pz-sp-van_ak.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
C 0.6666666666666643 0.3333333333333357 0.5810337763008668
C 0.3333333333333357 0.6666666666666643 0.4189662236991332
Ti 0.0000000000000000 0.0000000000000000 0.5000000000000000
Ti 0.3333333333333357 0.6666666666666643 0.6450254278856442
Ti 0.6666666666666643 0.3333333333333357 0.3549745721143557
CELL_PARAMETERS angstrom
  2.6883951985018508 -1.5514427239055619 0.0000111303329820
 -0.0006087877982130  3.1039398992248510 -0.0000197140399680
 -0.0000075989189900  0.0001016192400290 16.0000000145770898
K_POINTS AUTOMATIC
 10 10 4 0 0 0

I assume there is something wrong with pseudopotentials but could not figure how to solve it. Could you please point out the problem.

Thanks,
Ali




_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users


_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to