Hi,

The final enthalpy is not computed with the same wavefunction as the final energy.

This is because the number of wave-function is chosen by the original cutoff according to the original volume, and kept fixed during the whole relax.

However, since you are changing the volume, the number of wavefunction that satisfy the cutoff condition changes. This is why at the end of the vc-relax pw automatically does an extra scf calculation, redetermining the number of wf to use by the original cutoff at the final volume.

This is why energy / forces and stress tensor of the last calculation differs a bit from the last relaxation step (even if the cell and the atoms are the same).


The enthalpy printed is computed in the last step of vc-relax, while the energy you are taking is computed in the last scf calculation.

Therefore the correct result of the enthalpy is the one you performed manually adding the PV factor to the energy (note that this difference should go to zero as the cutoff -> infinity).

Bests,

LM


On 24/06/2018 12:04, Print S. wrote:
Dear users,

I have done vc-relax jobs using pw.x binary v.6.0 (svn rev. 13079). It completed  with this information in the final step

...
!    total energy              =   -2893.96255976 Ry
...

          total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3) (kbar)     P=    5.50
...

     Final enthalpy =   -2893.4953806269 Ry
Begin final coordinates
     new unit-cell volume =  12495.34754 a.u.^3 (  1851.61945 Ang^3 )

...

So I got the final enthalpy as reported by pw.x (call this H_reported) and I calculate the enthalpy from total energy using

H = E+PV
(called H_calc)


It turned out that H_reported and H_calc are not equal.

H_reported = -2893.4953806269 Ry = -39367.97664 eV
H_calc = E+PV=-39368.05688 eV

H_reported - H_calc = -0.08024 eV

So my questions are,

1) how does the pw.x determine final enthalpy in its report?
2) Is it theoretically correct to determine H=E+P*V directly from E, P and V reported in pw.x output. (Or should I determine P(V) by fitting the equation of state to E-V curve then derive H from that?) 3) If both the H_reported and H_calc are theoretically correct, why do the values differ?

My problem is not in this single case, it is that I did several relax jobs and the discrepancies in H_reported and H_calc are not systematic.

Thank you,
Vichawan Sakulsupich

MSc, Chulalongkorn University, THAILAND


--
Vichawan Sakulsupich [Print]


_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to