Dear Moon: there is no point in using any smearing in an insulator (but for 
plotting the DOS, possibly, but that would be for post-processing purposes 
only). In order to compute the DOS, you may want to try the tetrahedron method, 
which is implemented in QE, although I do not know exactly how … Otherwise, 
Gaussian (or any other smearing) would do, but only in the post-processing 
phase … HTH — SB


> On 7 Aug 2018, at 09:59, 문태환 <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Dear Stefano,
> 
> Your advice has helped a lot.
> 
> If I can ask you one more question, can I calculate the fermi energy for 
> semiconductor material if I use DOS calculations using 'gaussian smearing' 
> instead of 'occupations = fixed'?
> 
> Thank you again.
> 
> 
> Moon Taehwan, chung-ang university
> 보낸 사람: Stefano Baroni <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 대신 users 
> <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> 보낸 날짜: 2018년 8월 7일 화요일 오후 4:42:30
> 받는 사람: Quantum Espresso users Forum
> 제목: Re: [QE-users] How to obtain fermi energy through pDOS calculation of 
> quantum espresso?
>  
> Hi ???,
> 
> The energy zero in any infinite system is arbitrary. In the lack of a 
> surface, only energy differences matter. 
> The zero-temperature Fermi energy of an insulator is also arbitrary, though 
> usually assumed to lie at the middle of the gap.
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> Meanwhile, would you mind signing your posts with your name and affiliation?
> 
> Thanks — Stefano B
> 
>> On 7 Aug 2018, at 09:17, 문태환 <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello. I am a beginner to try DFT calculations using quantum espresso (GUI 
>> BURAI) for the first time.
>> An attempt was made to calculate the SCF and pDOS using the CIF-file of the 
>> organic-inorganic hybrid material (eg MAPbI3). I wanted to get the fermi 
>> energy, but I could not find it in the output file of nscf, dos, pdos, scf, 
>> etc. because I was immature and calculated occupation as 'fixed'.
>> The problem is that the energy of HOMO and LUMO is calculated as about 1.1 
>> eV and 4.4 eV, and I want to know what is the criterion of 0 eV.
>> 
>> If I use the gaussian smearing method, can I get the correct fermi energy?
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
>> <https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
> — 
> Stefano Baroni -  SISSA, Trieste - http://stefano.baroni.me 
> <http://stefano.baroni.me/>, stefanobaroni (Skype) 
> 
> If the prediction that an airplane can stay up depends on the difference 
> between Riemann and Lebesgue integration, I don’t want to fly in it [Richard 
> W. Hammings]
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> <https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
— 
Stefano Baroni - Trieste —  http://stefano.baroni.me 
<http://stefano.baroni.me/> 




_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to