I understand what you say about edir, I believe also that the system runs more efficiently with the magnetisation along the z-axis. Do you think overall the code is more efficient with say edir = 3,
Actually, that's only true for the electric field via modern theory of polarization (lefield) not for the saw-tooth potential (tefield).
cheers -- Lorenzo Paulatto - Paris _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
