Dear Sir,

I am running vc-relax using pw.x. But now, some structures are still not converged. The energy and enthalpy are cycling in some values. Please tell me why this happen? And how to solve it? Thank you~


     number of scf cycles    =  28
     number of bfgs steps    =  24

     enthalpy old            =    -264.9902566026 Ry
     enthalpy new            =    -264.9902565846 Ry

!    total energy              =    -264.99025637 Ry
     Harris-Foulkes estimate   =    -264.99025637 Ry
     estimated scf accuracy    <          1.2E-09 Ry


     number of scf cycles    =  29
     number of bfgs steps    =  24

     enthalpy old            =    -264.9902566026 Ry
     enthalpy new            =    -264.9902563710 Ry

!    total energy              =    -264.99025656 Ry
     Harris-Foulkes estimate   =    -264.99025657 Ry
     estimated scf accuracy    <          3.7E-09 Ry

     number of scf cycles    =  30
     number of bfgs steps    =  24

     enthalpy old            =    -264.9902566026 Ry
     enthalpy new            =    -264.9902565625 Ry

!    total energy              =    -264.99025639 Ry
     Harris-Foulkes estimate   =    -264.99025640 Ry
     estimated scf accuracy    <          7.5E-09 Ry

     number of scf cycles    =  31
     number of bfgs steps    =  24

     enthalpy old            =    -264.9902566026 Ry
     enthalpy new            =    -264.9902563914 Ry

!    total energy              =    -264.99025656 Ry
     Harris-Foulkes estimate   =    -264.99025656 Ry
     estimated scf accuracy    <          3.8E-09 Ry

     number of scf cycles    =  32
     number of bfgs steps    =  24

     enthalpy old            =    -264.9902566026 Ry
     enthalpy new            =    -264.9902565602 Ry

!    total energy              =    -264.99025640 Ry
     Harris-Foulkes estimate   =    -264.99025640 Ry
     estimated scf accuracy    <          2.1E-09 Ry

Regards,
Sha
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to