I see. One of these days I'll remove redundant stuff in average.x. The code does something really simple and there is no need to have it as complex as it is now.
Paolo On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 10:21 AM Kaňka Jiří <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Paolo, > > After removing “mpirun -n 32“ average.x >some-file works nicely (pw.x and > pp.x run parallely with mpirun on my computer with one 32-core processor > despite some warning). > > Thank you very much. > > Jiri > > > > *From:* users [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Kaňka Jiří > *Sent:* Saturday, March 23, 2019 8:41 PM > *To:* Quantum Espresso users Forum <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [QE-users] Error in routine average (1): nfile is wrong > > > > Dear Paolo, > > > > I have read all answers with the exception of the last week’s one which > was not shown in my search. Thank you for your summary of the requirements > for running average.x. > > > > The average program stopped with the “nfile error message“ for $ average.x > -i some-file, but it is running for ever (such case was also reported by > someone on this forum) for $ average.x < some-file. I use QE 6.3 on the Czech > academic METACENTRUM grid (paralelly on a single processor). > > > > I also use QE 6.3 within Quantum Mobile virtual maschine (with OMP) on my > computer. Here average.x runs for ever for both cases (-i and <). > > Likely I will have to work interactively on my computer with a direct > input from a terminal for the average‘s input varaiables . I have not > tried it yet. > > > > Thank you. > > > > Best regards, > > Jiri > > > > *From:* users [mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Paolo Giannozzi > *Sent:* Saturday, March 23, 2019 9:13 AM > *To:* Quantum Espresso users Forum <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [QE-users] Error in routine average (1): nfile is wrong > > > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 12:27 AM Kaňka Jiří <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I am facing an old (reported here already in 2017) problem: “Error in > routine average (1): nfile is wrong” > > > > reported much earlier and many times, answered as many times: > > - average.x reads from standard input > > - it works in parallel only on a single processor > > This is last week's answer: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg35542.html > > > > Paolo > > > > with a value of 1 at the 1st line of the input file for the nfile > variable of average.x. > > It seems to me that in the run-examples, which work well, the input > variables for average.x are read in a somewhat different way (actually > from a terminal, not from the file) . > > Does anybody know how to resolve the problem (besides extracting the 3D > data grid from the file generated by pp.x and putting them into Matlab) ? > > > > Thank you. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Jiri Kanka > > Optical Biosensors dpt. > > Institute of Photonics and Electronics > > Czech Academy of Sciences > > Prague > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > -- > > Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche, > Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy > Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222 > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche, Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
