Dear Achintya,

so, you want to simulate the layer sliding in SnSe in a phospherene-like structure.
And you get a barrier height of 1.25 eV. Does this make sense? I don't know.
Maybe should ask this specific question if you want to know the answer. Maybe
you can find some published data on this kind of transition? Maybe your
colleagues can help. The input looks ok. Only suggestion I have: use climbing
image NEB which usually gives better transition states.

Regards

Thomas

On 7/1/19 1:37 PM, Achintya Kumar wrote:
Dear Thomas
My input and output files are attached
BEGIN

BEGIN_PATH_INPUT
&PATH
restart_mode='from_scratch'
string_method='neb',
ds=2.D0,
opt_scheme="broyden",
num_of_images=15,
nstep_path = 60,
k_max=0.3D0,
k_min=0.20D0,
path_thr=0.1D0,
/
END_PATH_INPUT
BEGIN_ENGINE_INPUT
&CONTROL
prefix="snse"
outdir="./outdir",
pseudo_dir="/cad/QE/pseudopotentials/upf_files",
/
&SYSTEM
ibrav= 0,
celldm(1)=1.889725989,
nat= 4,
ntyp= 2,
ecutwfc= 40.0D0,
ecutrho= 200.0D0,
occupations= "fixed",
/
&ELECTRONS
conv_thr    = 1.D-6,
mixing_beta = 0.5D0,
/
&IONS
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Sn 118.71 Sn.pbe-dn-kjpaw_psl.0.2.UPF
Se 78.960 Se.pbe-n-kjpaw_psl.0.2.UPF
CELL_PARAMETERS (alat=  1.88972599)
   4.393133495   0.000000000   0.000000000
   0.000000000   4.245162285   0.000000000
   0.000000000   0.000000000  25.000000000

K_POINTS automatic
14 14 1 0 0 0
BEGIN_POSITIONS
FIRST_IMAGE
ATOMIC_POSITIONS angstrom
Sn       -0.27090369  0.000000000   11.151283650
Se        0.27090369  0.000000000   13.851931775
Sn       -2.467470438 2.122581143   13.848716350
Se        2.467470438 2.122581143   11.148068225
INTERMEDIATE_IMAGE
ATOMIC_POSITIONS angstrom
Sn       0.000000000 0.000000000   11.151283650
Se       0.000000000 0.000000000   13.851931775
Sn       2.196566748 2.122581143   13.848716350
Se       2.196566748 2.122581143   11.148068225
LAST_IMAGE
ATOMIC_POSITIONS angstrom
Sn       0.27090369  0.000000000   11.151283650
Se      -0.27090369  0.000000000   13.851931775
Sn       2.467470438 2.122581143   13.848716350
Se      -2.467470438 2.122581143   11.148068225
END_POSITIONS
END_ENGINE_INPUT

END
#############################################################
 activation energy (->) =   1.251588 eV
     activation energy (<-) =   1.251588 eV

     image        energy (eV)        error (eV/A)  frozen

         1     -17182.1943011            0.998235            T
         2     -17182.4628221            0.079139            F
         3     -17181.6722586            0.069784            F
         4     -17181.2913646            0.124247            F
         5     -17181.0750253            0.130701            F
         6     -17181.2203018            0.125583            F
         7     -17182.2031417            0.146372            F
         8     -17182.0989949            0.080510            F
         9     -17181.3352176            0.093461            F
        10     -17180.9427134            0.045147            F
        11     -17181.0428918            0.172851            F
        12     -17181.6282545            0.148683            F
        13     -17181.7506510            0.946514            F
        14     -17182.4631851            0.193101            F
        15     -17182.1943013            0.997393            T

     path length          = 32.289 bohr
     inter-image distance =  2.306 bohr

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------


     neb: reached the maximum number of steps

     NEB          :     9h37m CPU       10h36m WALL


   This run was terminated on:  22:39:42  14Jun2019

=------------------------------------------------------------------------------=
   JOB DONE.
=------------------------------------------------------------------------------=

On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 4:58 PM Thomas Brumme <thomas.bru...@uni-leipzig.de <mailto:thomas.bru...@uni-leipzig.de>> wrote:

    Dear Achintya,

    without any info on how you made your NEB calculation, which
    system using this or that
    parameter, we cannot judge if it is correct or not. If you don't
    want to or can't provide these
    informations, then you need to discuss this with some locals. Your
    supervisor?
    In general, if you want to know if an NEB makes sense you need to
    have an idea of the
    potential energy surface and look at the final path...

    Thomas

    On 7/1/19 12:02 PM, Achintya Kumar wrote:
    Dear Thomas
    How can I make sure that my neb calculation is correct or not.

    On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 3:29 PM Achintya Kumar
    <kumar.achinty...@gmail.com <mailto:kumar.achinty...@gmail.com>>
    wrote:

        Dear Thomas
        I have done the same thing by splitting my path in two
        separate paths, but I was just interested to know whether it
        is possible or not to fix an intermediate images.
        Thanks for your answer.

        On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 1:55 PM Thomas Brumme
        <thomas.bru...@uni-leipzig.de
        <mailto:thomas.bru...@uni-leipzig.de>> wrote:

            Dear Achintya,

            I think that fixing an intermediate image is not possible
            as this makes no sense.
            If an image is fixed, it is also an end point of an
            elastic band... So, if you just
            split your path in two separate paths you can fix this
            "intermediate" image.

            Cheerio

            Thomas

            On 7/1/19 8:19 AM, Achintya Kumar wrote:
            Hello
            How can I kept frozen intermediate images in NEB
            calculation?

-- =========================
            Achintya Priydarshi
            Research Scholar
            IIT Kanpur.
            ===========================

            _______________________________________________
            Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso  
<http://www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso>)
            users mailing listus...@lists.quantum-espresso.org  
<mailto:users@lists.quantum-espresso.org>
            https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- Dr. rer. nat. Thomas Brumme
            Wilhelm-Ostwald-Institute for Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
            Leipzig University
            Phillipp-Rosenthal-Strasse 31
            04103 Leipzig

            Tel:  +49 (0)341 97 36456

            email:thomas.bru...@uni-leipzig.de  
<mailto:thomas.bru...@uni-leipzig.de>



-- =========================
        Achintya Priydarshi
        Research Scholar
        IIT Kanpur.
        ===========================



-- =========================
    Achintya Priydarshi
    Research Scholar
    IIT Kanpur.
    ===========================

-- Dr. rer. nat. Thomas Brumme
    Wilhelm-Ostwald-Institute for Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
    Leipzig University
    Phillipp-Rosenthal-Strasse 31
    04103 Leipzig

    Tel:  +49 (0)341 97 36456

    email:thomas.bru...@uni-leipzig.de  <mailto:thomas.bru...@uni-leipzig.de>



--
=========================
Achintya Priydarshi
Research Scholar
IIT Kanpur.
===========================

--
Dr. rer. nat. Thomas Brumme
Wilhelm-Ostwald-Institute for Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
Leipzig University
Phillipp-Rosenthal-Strasse 31
04103 Leipzig

Tel:  +49 (0)341 97 36456

email: thomas.bru...@uni-leipzig.de

_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso)
users mailing list users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to