Indeed, the stress tensor converges poorly with cutoff, and an equation of 
state with ev.x would be better than vc relax (ie. 7-10 scf calculations at 
different volumes).

For all - please, *before* asking a question like this, try the parameters and 
pseudopotentials suggested by:
https://www.materialscloud.org/work/tools/qeinputgenerator

Nicola

Sent from a tiny keyboard... Contact info:
http://theossrv1.epfl.ch/Main/Contact

On 9 Dec 2019, at 09:39, Pietro Bonfà <[email protected]> wrote:

Dear S. Arash Sheikholeslam,

your settings for the basis set seem quite low, you should consider increasing 
these two values:

ecutwfc = 25.0, ecutrho = 300.0

You can check this web page 
https://www.materialscloud.org/discover/sssp/plot/efficiency/Pb to identify the 
appropriate basis set parameters for the pseudopotential that you are using. 
The actual values to be used should be converged according to the specific 
scientific case that you intend to investigate.

Reciprocal space sampling should probably also be improved.

Best regards,
Pietro


On 12/8/19 9:54 PM, sarashs wrote:
Hi quantum espresso users,
I am performing a vc-relax simulation on pb. I have included my input file for 
your convenience. The problem that I have is that the minimum energy cell is 
more than 1 Angstrom smaller on each dimension (3.25 Angstrom) while it should 
be around 4.95. I am wondering if you can help me figure out why? I have tried 
increasing the number of K points, ecutwfc and I tried with different degauss 
values but I was not successful in converging to the right size.
Is this an xc functional issue? or something else?
&control
  calculation =   "vc-relax"   ,
   restart_mode = 'from_scratch' ,
   outdir='$TMP_DIR/' ,
   pseudo_dir = '$PSEUDO_DIR' ,
   disk_io = 'default' ,
   verbosity = 'default' ,
   tstress = .true. ,
   tprnfor = .true. ,
 /
 &system
    ibrav = 2, celldm(1) =4.9505, nat= 1, ntyp= 1,
    ecutwfc = 25.0, ecutrho = 300.0
    occupations='smearing', smearing='gaussian', degauss=0.02
 /
 &electrons
    diagonalization='david'
    conv_thr = 1.0e-8
    mixing_beta = 0.7
 /
&IONS
 /
 &CELL
   cell_dynamics = 'bfgs',
   press = 1.00 ,
 /
ATOMIC_SPECIES
 Pb 207.2 Pb.pbe-dn-kjpaw_psl.1.0.0.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS alat
 Pb 0.0 0.0 0.0
K_POINTS (automatic)
 5 5 5 0 0 0
Best regards,
S. Arash Sheikholeslam
_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso)
users mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users


--
Pietro Bonfà
Department of Mathematical, Physical and Computer Sciences,
University of Parma,
Italy
_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso)
users mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso)
users mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to