Dear all,

I’m trying to make a test calculation of a crystal containing the Gd atom. I 
use the DFT+U scheme.
However, as the program starts, I’ve immediately facing the following error:

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
     Error in routine offset_atom_wfc (2):
     wrong offset
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%


I’ve browsed the PW/src/offset_atom_wfc.f90 routine. It seems (that is what I 
have understood) that while in Modules/set_hubbard_l.f90 it is set 
hubbard_l = 3  for that atomic species, in the pseudo potential file (see e.g. 
http://www.quantum-espresso.org/upf_files/Gd.pbe-spdn-kjpaw_psl.1.0.0.UPF 
<http://www.quantum-espresso.org/upf_files/Gd.pbe-spdn-kjpaw_psl.1.0.0.UPF>)
the l=3 wave function is not found.
The atomic configuration of Gd is Xe 4f7 5d1 6s2.

So my question is:

i) it is sufficient to solve the problem or wrong to set hubbard_l = 2 in 
Modules/set_hubbard_l.f90?
ii) more importantly (sorry for the basic question, I’v never considered 
systems with f electrons): why f electrons are not considered in the pseudo 
file?
Should the Hubbard U be more important for those l=3 electronic states than for 
l=2 states?

Thanks for any answer you could provide.

Giovanni



-- 

Giovanni Cantele, PhD

CNR-SPIN
c/o Dipartimento di Fisica
Universita' di Napoli "Federico II"
Complesso Universitario M. S. Angelo - Ed. 6
Via Cintia, I-80126, Napoli, Italy

e-mail: [email protected]
            [email protected]
Phone: +39 081 676910
Skype contact: giocan74
Web page: https://sites.google.com/view/giovanni-cantele

_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso)
users mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to