Hello,
        I'm trying to compute the charge density difference for a molecule on a 
substrate, modelled as a two-dimensionally-periodic slab. The relationship I'm 
using is 

        Diff(n) = w1*n(mol.+slab) - w2*n(slab) - w3*n(mol.) 

where "n" is a density computed using Postprocessing (pp.x, plot_num=7) and w's 
are weighting factors. 
        I'm aware that all densities have to be obtained with the same atom 
positions, ecutwfc, ecutrho, etc., and I've done that.  I'm having trouble 
getting results that are not obviously wrong (e.g., Diff(n) that is orders of 
magnitude too large). I've read the available posts that I can find, but none 
addresses my questions, which are: 

(1) The SCF calculations used to obtain the wavefunctions were all done with 
'vdw_corr=TS'. When I run pp.x to get the densities, the output file includes 
the message 
        *** vdW-TS term will be missing in potential *** 
Does this mean that I shouldn't have used TS when computing the wavefunctions ? 
Can this message be ignored, or is there a fatal error ? 

(2)  The molcule is paramagnetic, so the SCF calculations for n(mol.+slab) and 
n(mol.) were spin-polarized, but that for n(slab) was not. In obtaining Diff(n) 
I'm using the highest majority-spin bands for n(mol.+slab) and n(mol.). 
        Can I then use the highest doubly-occupied band for n(slab) if I set 
w2/w1 = 0.5 ? 
        Do I have to do a spin-polarized calculation for n(slab) even though 
it's diamagnetic ? 
        Is further adjustment of w2/w1 need to account for the fact that 
mol.+slab and slab involve a different total number of electrons ? 

(3)     The slab comprises a 4x4 supercell with 1 molecule. Should I then set 
w3/w1 = 1/16 ? Again, is any further adjustment of w3/w1 needed ? 

(4)     In the SCF calculations of n(mol.+slab) and n(slab) I used a 3x3 MP 
grid (because of the large supercell). For n(mol.), on the other hand, I used 
just the gamma point (because the isolated molecules are far apart).
        Is that OK, or should I have used the same MP grid in obtaining n(mol.) 
? 

Thanks in advance for your help. 

Best Wishes,
Vic Bermudez
U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (retired) 
_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso)
users mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to