Thanks, Paolo! I guess ATOMPAW code should be corrected to print correct mesh size.
23.10.2020, 10:01, "Paolo Giannozzi" <[email protected]>:
,There are two sets of problems in your PP file (not in the code):- at line 54, mesh_size="2000" is not correct, it should be the same as "mesh" (1035) a few lines below- the "index" attribute is missing in several xml tags.The simplest thing to do is to manually change "mesh_size" to 1035, then apply the attached patch (that disables the checks) and recompile. The previous version was silently overwriting the correct value of "mesh" over the bad one and was not performing many checksPaoloOn Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 5:16 PM Sergey Lisenkov <[email protected]> wrote:Dear all,I noticed that in developing version of QE several bugs related to DFT+U were fixed so I tried to use the latest snapshot. However, I encountered a problem with my PAW pseudopotentials from ATOMPAW:mismatch meshthat comes from upflib/read_upf_new.f90I checked my UPF file and I see that meshes are different in some places of the file, however v.6.6 is OK with that.Was something changed in the code as well?Thanks,SergeyUSF_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche,
Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu) users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
