Well said! Anybody volunteering? SB

> On 9 Oct 2021, at 14:33, Giuseppe Mattioli <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> Dear Stefano
> "cumbersome" does not mean "illogical"! It is legitimate that one wants to 
> order orbitals as you sort them in the periodic table aufbau. This should not 
> be impossible, as you need to insert the all-electron configuration into the 
> ld1.x input file when you build the pseudopotential; you should only attach 
> the correct orbital label to the pseudowavefunction. A code that do this 
> would be more user friendly, without requiring the (admittedly negligible, 
> since the second or third time you do it) effort to reorder the orbitals.
> Best
> Giuseppe
> 
> Quoting Stefano Baroni <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:
> 
>> As illogic as the naming convention may seem to some, it is not. The only 
>> feature a pseudo-wavefunction may me characterised with is the number of 
>> nodes of its radial component. In fact, pseudo-potentials are constructed 
>> exactly from the requirement that their lowest-lying states (which are 
>> node-less, as you can check at page 33 of your favorite quantum mechanics 
>> textbook) match the energy and the main lobe of the all-electron radial 
>> wave-function. Summarising: the lowest-lying atomic orbital of a pseudo-atom 
>> is always nodeless (by construction) the code labels it as 1s, 2p, 3d, etc. 
>> (n=1, l-0; n=2, l-1; n=3, l=2) the number of nodes is always n-l-1 (page 34 
>> of the above textbook): you can check for yourself that it is 0 for 1s, 2p, 
>> 3d, 4f, etc. The code cannot know the radial quantum of the “real” orbital. 
>> It does know the angular quantum number and the number of nodes, though …
>> 
>> Hope this clarifies a little bit the whole matter.
>> SB
>> 
>>> On 9 Oct 2021, at 11:37, Giuseppe Mattioli <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Dear user (please sign your posts with name and affiliation)
>>> 
>>> Orbitals are ordered according to pseudowavefunctions in the 
>>> pseudopotential. It is cumbersome but not difficult to reorder them
>>> 
>>> 1s = 3s
>>> 2p = 3p
>>> 3s = 4s
>>> 4d = 3d
>>> 
>>> HTH
>>> Giuseppe
>>> 
>>> Quoting Satyasiban Dash ph19d005 <[email protected]>:
>>> 
>>>> Dear Users
>>>> 
>>>> I need a little confirmation about nomenclature of outputfiles projwfc.x
>>>> generates. I was calculating PDOS of ZnO using pseudopotential from ps
>>>> library (PBE-GGA) . Its well known that ZnO has 4s,2s,2p and 3d orbital
>>>> but I am getting 1s,2p,3s,4d
>>>> &CONTROL
>>>>                calculation = 'scf' ,
>>>>                     outdir = 'job$tpdir' ,
>>>>                 pseudo_dir = '/lfs/usrhome/phd/ph19d005/pseudo' ,
>>>>                     prefix = 'zn' ,
>>>>                lkpoint_dir = .false. ,
>>>>                  verbosity = 'low' ,
>>>>              etot_conv_thr = 1.0d-05 ,
>>>>              forc_conv_thr = 1.00d-04 ,
>>>> 
>>>> /
>>>> &SYSTEM
>>>>                      ibrav = 0,
>>>>                        nat = 4,
>>>>                       ntyp = 2,
>>>>                    ecutwfc = 40 ,
>>>>                    ecutrho = 500 ,
>>>>                    nbnd =30
>>>>                occupations = 'smearing' ,
>>>>                smearing ='gaussian'
>>>> /
>>>> &ELECTRONS
>>>>           electron_maxstep = 80,
>>>>                   conv_thr = 8.0000000000d-10 ,
>>>>               adaptive_thr = .false. ,
>>>>                mixing_beta = 4.0000000000d-01 ,
>>>> /
>>>> CELL_PARAMETERS angstrom
>>>>    3.289102049    0.000000000    0.000000000
>>>>   -1.644551024    2.848445930    0.000000000
>>>>    0.000000000    0.000000000    5.306821000
>>>> ATOMIC_SPECIES
>>>>   O   15.99940  O.pbe-nl-kjpaw_psl.1.0.0.UPF
>>>>  Zn   65.38000  Zn.pbe-spn-kjpaw_psl.1.0.0.UPF
>>>> ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
>>>>  Zn      0.333333333    0.666666667    0.000548000
>>>>  Zn      0.666666667    0.333333333    0.500548000
>>>>   O      0.333333333    0.666666667    0.379762000
>>>>   O      0.666666667    0.333333333    0.879762000
>>>> K_POINTS automatic
>>>> 12 12 6 0 0 0
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> &PROJWFC
>>>>                     prefix = '$pref' ,
>>>>                     outdir =
>>>> '/lfs/usrhome/phd/ph19d005/scratch/job444857/job444857' ,
>>>>                    filpdos = 'zn_pdos.dat' ,
>>>>                    filproj = 'zn_proj.dat' ,
>>>>                     ngauss = 0,
>>>>                    degauss = 0.01 ,
>>>>                     DeltaE = 0.01 ,
>>>>                       Emin = -8 ,
>>>>                       Emax = 8 ,
>>>> /
>>>> 
>>>> Is it an indication error or something else
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> GIUSEPPE MATTIOLI
>>> CNR - ISTITUTO DI STRUTTURA DELLA MATERIA
>>> Via Salaria Km 29,300 - C.P. 10
>>> I-00015 - Monterotondo Scalo (RM)
>>> Mob (*preferred*) +39 373 7305625
>>> Tel + 39 06 90672342 - Fax +39 06 90672316
>>> E-mail: <[email protected]>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
>>> users mailing list [email protected]
>>> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> 
>> —
>> Stefano Baroni - Trieste —  http://stefano.baroni.me 
>> <http://stefano.baroni.me/> <http://stefano.baroni.me/ 
>> <http://stefano.baroni.me/>>
> 
> 
> 
> GIUSEPPE MATTIOLI
> CNR - ISTITUTO DI STRUTTURA DELLA MATERIA
> Via Salaria Km 29,300 - C.P. 10
> I-00015 - Monterotondo Scalo (RM)
> Mob (*preferred*) +39 373 7305625
> Tel + 39 06 90672342 - Fax +39 06 90672316
> E-mail: <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu 
> <http://www.max-centre.eu/>)
> users mailing list [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> <https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
— 
Stefano Baroni - Trieste —  http://stefano.baroni.me 
<http://stefano.baroni.me/> 




_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to