Dear Quantum ESPRESSO developers,
  I am doing the cell optimization for cassiterite (SnO2) using the 
variable cell shape molecular dynamics (i.e., cell_dynamics='damp-w') in QE 
7.0. I had set ibrav=6 for the crystal of cassiterite, and wanted to constrain 
cell_dofree='ibrav+shape' during the optimization. However, I found the 
none-zero values of v1_y&z, v2_x&z, v3_x&y in the output file, e.g.,


CELL_PARAMETERS (alat=  8.95238858)
   0.999715701   0.000000089  -0.000000001
   0.000000089   0.999715701  -0.000000001
  -0.000000001  -0.000000001   0.672987836



which was not absolutely consistent with the initial ibrav choice (i.e., 
ibrav=6). Then I tested the performance of cell_dofree='ibrav', and found the 
same phenomenon. It seems that the cell_dofree command does not strictly 
constrain the initial ibrav choice. I also tested cell_dofree='xyz+shape' 
although I had guessed that it did not work.
  I am wondering if there is any way to strictly achieve 
cell_dofree='ibrav+shape' (which is equal to cell_dofree='xyz+shape' in this 
case) during the cell optimization. Perhaps another solution is to fix the 
angles during the cell optimization, but how to achieve? My input file is 
attached for reference.
  Thank you for your time and I am looking forward to your reply.
Sincerely,
Tianhua Wang




Tianhua Wang
State Key Laboratory for Mineral Deposits Research
School of Earth Sciences and Engineering
Nanjing University
163 Xianlin Avenue, Nanjing
Jiangsu 210023, China

Attachment: SnO2.in
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
and economic cooperation amongst peoples
_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to