Dear users,

I am quite new to QuantumEspresso. In the past weeks, I managed to run some BOMD NVT simulations, for which I previously relaxed the electronic structure and perform a NVE thermalization. However, I am now interested in repeating the procedure but allowing the crystal cell to move. I first relaxed the electronic structure without moving the atoms, nor the cell:

&ELECTRONS
  emass = 500,
  emass_cutoff = 3.0,
  orthogonalization = 'ortho',
  electron_dynamics = 'damp',
  electron_damping = 0.1
/

&IONS
  ion_dynamics = 'none',
  ion_temperature = 'not_controlled',
  tranp(1)= .true.
  tranp(2)= .true.
  tranp(3)= .true.
  amprp(1)= 0.35
  amprp(2)= 0.35
  amprp(3)= 0.35
/

&CELL
  cell_parameters='default'
  cell_dynamics='none'
/

Then I tried to perform a NVE trajectory allowing both the cell and the atoms to move:


&ELECTRONS
  emass = 1000,
  emass_cutoff = 3.0,
  orthogonalization = 'ortho',
  ortho_max=1000,
  electron_dynamics = 'verlet',
/

&IONS
  ion_dynamics = 'verlet',
  ion_temperature = 'not_controlled',
/

&CELL
  cell_dynamics='pr',
  cell_velocities='zero'
/

Restarting from the electronic relaxation. However, I get stuck with a orthogonalization problem and I am not sure whether my protocol is not valid and maybe I should do either NVE on the ions and the cell separately firstly, and then allow both to move. Can you please suggest how to proceed?

Manuel
_______________________________________________
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
and economic cooperation amongst peoples
_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to