Unsettling indeed! :-)
But happy to hear that everything is settled now.
Best
Giuseppe

Ari P Seitsonen <[email protected]> ha scritto:

I think that I found it: Switching the 'restart_mode' from 'restart' to 'from_scratch' in the name list '&control' "released" the atoms to relax properly.

I have no idea why this should have an effect on the relaxation: I always keep it as 'restart' in the calculations with the NEB, and the code 'pw.x' performs the restart if the files needed for a restart are present, otherwise the calculation starts from the given configuration and with the same initialisation of the electronic structure as with 'from_scratch', so I was expecting the same to happen with the NEB. My mistake, "never expect the logic of the developer to be the same as your own". Now happily computing all kinds of barriers and paths! :)

    Greetings from Paris and Grazie a Giuseppe again,

       apsi

-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-
  Ari Paavo Seitsonen / [email protected] / http://www.iki.fi/~apsi/
                            Слава Україні


On Thu, 27 Apr 2023, Ari P Seitsonen wrote:


Dear Giuseppe,

Thank you for the comment. One of my concerns was that the energy in the images does not really change:

grep -w '  4  ' neb.out
       4     -78481.6171806           29.739170            F
       4     -78481.6171811           29.738137            F
       4     -78481.6171811           29.736993            F
       4     -78481.6171811           29.734436            F
       4     -78481.6171812           29.727381            F
       4     -78481.6171809           29.718296            F
       4     -78481.6171808           29.712880            F
       4     -78481.6171810           29.713046            F
       4     -78481.6171810           29.719086            F
       4     -78481.6171811           29.729326            F
       4     -78481.6171812           29.740800            F
       4     -78481.6171805           29.752151            F
       4     -78481.6171812           29.761356            F
       4     -78481.6171812           29.769083            F
       4     -78481.6171805           29.774024            F
       4     -78481.6171812           29.776518            F
       4     -78481.6171800           29.776688            F
       4     -78481.6171811           29.773882            F

There are forces on the atoms, here again on one of them on the fourth image:

   atom   84 type  2   force =    -0.00407872    0.00078289   -0.00018719
   atom   84 type  2   force =    -0.00407494    0.00078224   -0.00018711
   atom   84 type  2   force =    -0.00407554    0.00078237   -0.00018713
   atom   84 type  2   force =    -0.00407560    0.00078248   -0.00018709
   atom   84 type  2   force =    -0.00407511    0.00078229   -0.00018712
   atom   84 type  2   force =    -0.00407619    0.00078255   -0.00018726
   atom   84 type  2   force =    -0.00407623    0.00078272   -0.00018718
   atom   84 type  2   force =    -0.00407528    0.00078225   -0.00018721
   atom   84 type  2   force =    -0.00407564    0.00078257   -0.00018705
   atom   84 type  2   force =    -0.00407500    0.00078222   -0.00018713
   atom   84 type  2   force =    -0.00407577    0.00078249   -0.00018711
   atom   84 type  2   force =    -0.00406905    0.00078120   -0.00018643
   atom   84 type  2   force =    -0.00407551    0.00078243   -0.00018722
   atom   84 type  2   force =    -0.00407271    0.00078203   -0.00018711
   atom   84 type  2   force =    -0.00407796    0.00078294   -0.00018727
   atom   84 type  2   force =    -0.00407607    0.00078266   -0.00018716
   atom   84 type  2   force =    -0.00407437    0.00078207   -0.00018715
   atom   84 type  2   force =    -0.00407642    0.00078274   -0.00018719

The 'path length' indeed keeps on increasing - what is this, if the energies of the images remain the same?

   initial path length           =  5.0000 bohr
   path length          =  5.000 bohr
   path length          =  5.000 bohr
   path length          =  5.003 bohr
   path length          =  5.013 bohr
   path length          =  5.094 bohr
   path length          =  5.337 bohr
   path length          =  5.702 bohr
   path length          =  6.163 bohr
   path length          =  6.695 bohr
   path length          =  7.277 bohr
   path length          =  7.897 bohr
   path length          =  8.546 bohr
   path length          =  9.216 bohr
   path length          =  9.904 bohr
   path length          = 10.606 bohr
   path length          = 11.321 bohr
   path length          = 12.047 bohr
   path length          = 12.783 bohr

Probably I am doing something really stupid somewhere... I will try to look at the source code next and try to understand somewhat better for what is done in the code, the meaning of the variables and so on.

  Greetings,

     apsi

-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-
Ari Paavo Seitsonen / [email protected] / http://www.iki.fi/~apsi/
                          Слава Україні


On Thu, 27 Apr 2023, Giuseppe Mattioli wrote:


Dear Ari
The NEB is not exactly "stuck"

    path length          =  8.546 bohr
    path length          =  9.216 bohr
    path length          =  9.904 bohr

The MEP length keeps increasing. Maybe a look into the trajectory files can tell you what's happening. If any other source of misbehavior can be excluded, try to go ahead (maybe fixing the position of "useless" atoms). I've experienced NEB in large systems converged after several hundreds steps.
HTH
Giuseppe

Quoting Ari P Seitsonen <[email protected]>:

Dear Users,

I have a problem in the calculations with the method NEB: The atoms do not get relaxed even if there are clearly forces on the atoms. The electronic structure converges well, and the relaxation of the ions follows nicely when the NEB is not used.

 I have in the input

BEGIN
BEGIN_PATH_INPUT
&PATH
 restart_mode      = 'restart'
 string_method     = 'neb'
 nstep_path        =  30
 ds                = 0.2
 opt_scheme        = "broyden"
 num_of_images     = 8
 k_max             = 0.3
 k_min             = 0.2
 CI_scheme         = "auto"
!  minimum_image     = .true.
 first_last_opt    = .true.
 path_thr          = 0.1
/
END_PATH_INPUT

and

&ions
/

I have tried with different values of 'num_of_images', 'k_min' and 'k_max', with the climbing image and without. One calculation - a diffusion path of one ad-atom on a surface - worked well, all other become stuck with the output like:


------------------------------ iteration 12 ------------------------------

    cpu =  0   tcpu =   9589.5    self-consistency for image   1
    cpu =  0   tcpu =   9656.9    self-consistency for image   3
    cpu =  0   tcpu =   9823.9    self-consistency for image   5
    cpu =  0   tcpu =  10043.8    self-consistency for image   7

    activation energy (->) =  10.012055 eV
    activation energy (<-) =   6.833374 eV

    image        energy (eV)        error (eV/A)        frozen

        1     -78491.5920678            0.000987            F
        2     -78490.3334035            7.018378            F
        3     -78486.4101831           18.058881            F
        4     -78481.6171805           29.752151            F
        5     -78481.5800131           29.996389            F
        6     -78485.0169815           13.489042            F
        7     -78487.7020649            7.675245            F
        8     -78488.4133872            8.072137            F

    climbing image =  5

    path length          =  8.546 bohr
    inter-image distance =  1.221 bohr

------------------------------ iteration 13 ------------------------------

    cpu =  0   tcpu =  10165.0    self-consistency for image   1
    cpu =  0   tcpu =  10267.1    self-consistency for image   3
    cpu =  0   tcpu =  10487.8    self-consistency for image   5
    cpu =  0   tcpu =  10710.2    self-consistency for image   7

    activation energy (->) =  10.011390 eV
    activation energy (<-) =   6.833374 eV

    image        energy (eV)        error (eV/A)        frozen

        1     -78491.5914028            0.000493            F
        2     -78490.3334036            7.099250            F
        3     -78486.4101837           17.820470            F
        4     -78481.6171812           29.761356            F
        5     -78481.5800130           29.998875            F
        6     -78485.0169810           13.636010            F
        7     -78487.7020648            7.675132            F
        8     -78488.4133870            8.071850            F

    climbing image =  5

    path length          =  9.216 bohr
    inter-image distance =  1.317 bohr

------------------------------ iteration 14 ------------------------------

    cpu =  0   tcpu =  10843.3    self-consistency for image   1
    cpu =  0   tcpu =  10962.6    self-consistency for image   3
    cpu =  0   tcpu =  11183.6    self-consistency for image   5
    cpu =  0   tcpu =  11420.4    self-consistency for image   7

    activation energy (->) =  10.011390 eV
    activation energy (<-) =   6.833374 eV

    image        energy (eV)        error (eV/A)        frozen

        1     -78491.5914032            0.000582            F
        2     -78490.3334034            7.139704            F
        3     -78486.4101836           17.548234            F
        4     -78481.6171812           29.769083            F
        5     -78481.5800132           29.998295            F
        6     -78485.0169814           13.849319            F
        7     -78487.7020642            7.669197            F
        8     -78488.4133871            8.072137            F

    climbing image =  5

    path length          =  9.904 bohr
    inter-image distance =  1.415 bohr

------------------------------ iteration 15 ------------------------------

...

So the atoms do not move, the electronic structure is converged in few iterations, but the energies of individual images change in the micro-eVs.

 Any idea would be appreciated; thank you in advance for any hints.

   Greetings,

      apsi



-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-
 Ari Paavo Seitsonen / [email protected] / http://www.iki.fi/~apsi/
                           Слава Україні



GIUSEPPE MATTIOLI
CNR - ISTITUTO DI STRUTTURA DELLA MATERIA
Via Salaria Km 29,300 - C.P. 10
I-00015 - Monterotondo Scalo (RM)
Mob (*preferred*) +39 373 7305625
Tel + 39 06 90672342 - Fax +39 06 90672316
E-mail: <[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
and economic cooperation amongst peoples
_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users



GIUSEPPE MATTIOLI
CNR - ISTITUTO DI STRUTTURA DELLA MATERIA
Via Salaria Km 29,300 - C.P. 10
I-00015 - Monterotondo Scalo (RM)
Mob (*preferred*) +39 373 7305625
Tel + 39 06 90672342 - Fax +39 06 90672316
E-mail: <[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
and economic cooperation amongst peoples
_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to