Dear Chris, Can you share the input and output files and the pseudos? We need to reproduce the error and check what is wrong. I think that projwfc does not work (not implemented) with two Hubbard channels per element.
Greetings, Iurii -- Dr. Iurii TIMROV Senior Research Scientist Theory and Simulation of Materials (THEOS) Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL) CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland +41 21 69 34 881 http://people.epfl.ch/265334 ________________________________ From: users <[email protected]> on behalf of Christoph Wolf <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2023 4:53:00 AM To: Quantum Espresso users Forum Subject: [QE-users] Projwfc.x: Mismatch between the requested and available manifolds Hi guys, I have a slight problem with projwfc and the new Hubbard U formalism. The scf and nscf finish without any issue using the following Hubbard U input: HUBBARD ortho-atomic U C-2p 1D-10 U Dy-5d 1 U Dy-6s 1 (C and Dy are there only species, for C I use the PSL PP and for Dy the PAW dataset with the latest atompaw which includes proper labels). Unfortunately projwfc ends with the following Program PROJWFC v.7.1 starts on 18Jun2023 at 11:39:15 This program is part of the open-source Quantum ESPRESSO suite for quantum simulation of materials; please cite "P. Giannozzi et al., J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 21 395502 (2009); "P. Giannozzi et al., J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 29 465901 (2017); "P. Giannozzi et al., J. Chem. Phys. 152 154105 (2020); URL http://www.quantum-espresso.org";, in publications or presentations arising from this work. More details at http://www.quantum-espresso.org/quote Parallel version (MPI), running on 40 processors MPI processes distributed on 1 nodes R & G space division: proc/nbgrp/npool/nimage = 40 168388 MiB available memory on the printing compute node when the environment starts Reading xml data from directory: ./tmp/Dy.save/ %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Error in routine offset_atom_wfc (2): Mismatch between the requested and available manifolds %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% stopping ... Is there anything wrong with the way I define the Hubbard input? If I don’t apply two manifolds (d and s) it works without any problem. Thanks in advance for any help! :) Chris -- Group Leader "Theory of Quantum Systems at Surfaces" IBS Center for Quantum Nanoscience Seoul, South Korea ___________________________________________________________ [https://icqns2023.org] https://www.icqns2023.org/
_______________________________________________ The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian people and expresses its concerns about the devastating effects that the Russian military offensive has on their country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural, and economic cooperation amongst peoples _______________________________________________ Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu) users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
