Thanks Paolo!


This is a chance to remind everyone that there are sets of carefully tested pseudopotentials (PBE and PBEsol) with suggested cutoffs on https://materialscloud.org/sssp ; these cover the entire periodic table. There are two choices - efficiency or precision. They have been verified again all electron calculations in https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.17274 - so consider these result scarefully - if your pseudopotential are not accueate, or cutoffs or samplings, your results will be incorrect.

The QE input generator (not yet updated to the last SSSP 1.3) gives also some reasonable input parameters you can always use as a sanity check https://www.materialscloud.org/work/tools/qeinputgenerator

                        nicola



On 04/09/2023 11:42, Paolo Giannozzi wrote:
On 9/4/23 11:09, Konstantin Glazyrin wrote:

An example - target relaxation pressure 600 kbar:
1 - total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=   600.65 - last run of structure relaxation 2 - total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=   484.28 - final scf run
May I ask - what does it indicate

it indicates that your kinetic cutoff is too low for a good description of the pressure

which value I should trust more and how should I proceed?

the former is the pressure, computed for the plane-wave basis set of the INITIAL unit cell. The latter is the pressure, computed for the plane-wave basis set of the FINAL unit cell.
They should converge to the same value at sufficiently high cutoff.

Is it because of this?
SCF correction compared to forces is large: reduce conv_thr to get better values
For me it is conv_thr =   6.4000000000d-06

it is a bit too large, but it is hardly related to the original problem

Paolo

Thank you!
best wishes,
             Konstantin

--
Beamline Scientist
DESY, FS-PE, bldg. 47c, L115
Notkestrasse 85
22607 Hamburg, Germany

_______________________________________________
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
and economic cooperation amongst peoples
_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users


--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prof Nicola Marzari, Chair of Theory and Simulation of Materials, EPFL
Director, National Centre for Competence in Research NCCR MARVEL, SNSF
Head, Laboratory for Materials Simulations, Paul Scherrer Institut
Contact info and websites at http://theossrv1.epfl.ch/Main/Contact

_______________________________________________
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
and economic cooperation amongst peoples
_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to