Dear Quantum Espresso users,

I am trying to obtain the bulk modulus of MgH2 by fitting the total energy versus volume curve to the Murnaghan equation of state. MgH2 has a tetragonal crystal system with P42/mnm symmetry. From the literature, it appears that B0 should be around 40-50 GPa. However, I am obtaining a value of 5 GPa. The input I am using is as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

&CONTROL
                       title = 'ES-calculation' ,
                 calculation = 'relax' ,
                restart_mode = 'from_scratch' ,
                      outdir = './' ,
                  pseudo_dir = './' ,
                  wf_collect = .FALSE. ,
                     disk_io = 'none' ,
 /
 &SYSTEM
                       ibrav = 6,
                           A = 4.00,
                           C = 2.672,
                        nat = 6 ,
                        ntyp = 2 ,
                     ecutwfc = 80 ,
                     ecutrho = 320 ,
                   input_dft = 'PBE' ,
                 occupations = 'smearing',
                    smearing = 'gaussian',
                     degauss = 0.02,
 /
 &ELECTRONS
                    conv_thr = 1.0d-8,
                 mixing_beta = 0.7,
 /
 &IONS
                ion_dynamics = 'bfgs' ,
            trust_radius_max = 0.2 ,
            trust_radius_min = 1.0d-4 ,
 /
ATOMIC_SPECIES
    Mg   24.3050  Mg.pbe-spnl-kjpaw_psl.1.0.0.UPF
    H    1.00000  H.pbe-kjpaw_psl.1.0.0.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
 H      0.19520000000000      0.80480000000000      0.50000000000000
 H      0.69520000000000      0.69520000000000     -0.00000000000000
 H      0.80480000000000      0.19520000000000      0.50000000000000
K_POINTS automatic
  3 3 5   1 1 1

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The output of this example ends like this:

!    total energy              =      -6.61308602 Ry
     Harris-Foulkes estimate   =      -6.61308602 Ry
     estimated scf accuracy    <          5.1E-12 Ry

     total all-electron energy =        -6.613060 Ry

     The total energy is the sum of the following terms:

     one-electron contribution =      -0.79116562 Ry
     hartree contribution      =       1.35759033 Ry
     xc contribution           =      -3.89869029 Ry
     ewald contribution        =      -3.27197209 Ry
     one-center paw contrib.   =      -0.00084285 Ry
     smearing contrib. (-TS)   =      -0.00800550 Ry

     convergence has been achieved in   5 iterations

     Forces acting on atoms (cartesian axes, Ry/au):

     atom    1 type  2   force =    -0.00001212    0.00001212    0.00000000
     atom    2 type  2   force =    -0.00000576   -0.00000576    0.00000000
     atom    3 type  2   force =     0.00001212   -0.00001212    0.00000000
     atom    4 type  2   force =     0.00000576    0.00000576    0.00000000
     atom    5 type  1   force =     0.00000000    0.00000000    0.00000000
     atom    6 type  1   force =     0.00000000    0.00000000    0.00000000

     Total force =     0.000027     Total SCF correction =     0.000001

     bfgs converged in  48 scf cycles and  47 bfgs steps
     (criteria: energy <  1.0E-04 Ry, force <  1.0E-03 Ry/Bohr)

     End of BFGS Geometry Optimization

     Final energy   =      -6.6130860246 Ry

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The obtained values of volume (where V=a^2*c) and total energy are:

Vol (ang^3)      Total energy (eV)
28.640500       -89.84334
33.836204       -89.93096
36.654496       -89.95390
39.625092       -89.96478
42.752000       -89.96531
46.039228       -89.95738
49.490784       -89.94272
56.902912       -89.89999
65.020448       -89.84715

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The fit to the Murnaghan equation seems to be correct, which makes me question whether the calculation of the energies might be wrong. According to literature, the total energy should be around -17.822 eV after optimization. However, my values are around -89 eV (-6.61 Ry). I cannot find where the problem lies. I have verified that ecutwfc, ecutrho, and the k-points are converged. I can’t think of what else to do. Could someone please verify the total energy of this structure or guide me on where the issue might be?

Thank you in advance!




_______________________________________________
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
and economic cooperation amongst peoples
_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to