Dear QE users,
I am trying to run the Force theorem example (see [1] below for the link) with 
DFT+U. The original example is using PBE. The calculation procedure is the 
following:

  1.  Run collinear SCF calculation
  2.  Use SCF collinear calculation density and potentials to run NSCF SOC 
calculations with different magnetization angles and lforcet=True and use the 
energy differences
I used Re atom in vacuum to test the procedure and here are the inputs I use:
For step 1:
&CONTROL
   calculation     = 'scf'
   outdir          = 'pwscf_output'
   prefix          = 'pwscf'
   pseudo_dir      = './'
   wf_collect      = .true.
/
&SYSTEM
   degauss         = 0.001
   ecutwfc         = 100
   ibrav           = 0
   input_dft       = 'pbe'
   nat             = 1
   nosym           = .false.
   nspin           = 2
   ntyp            = 1
   occupations     = 'smearing'
   smearing        = 'gauss'
   starting_magnetization(1) = 1
   tot_charge      = 2
/
&ELECTRONS
   conv_thr        = 1e-07
/

ATOMIC_SPECIES
   Re 186.2 Re.pz-spn-rrkjus_psl.1.0.0.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS bohr
   Re      -1.66168343      -0.00000189       0.00000756
K_POINTS automatic
   1 1 1  0 0 0
CELL_PARAMETERS bohr
        18.89726133       0.00000000       0.00000000
         0.00000000      18.89726133       0.00000000
         0.00000000       0.00000000      18.89726133
HUBBARD atomic
U Re-5d 4
Then for step 2, I copied the entire SCF calculation folder into another folder 
and modified the input file as the following:
&CONTROL
   calculation     = 'nscf'
   outdir          = 'pwscf_output'
   prefix          = 'pwscf'
   pseudo_dir      = './'
   wf_collect      = .true.
/
&SYSTEM
   angle1(1)       = 90
   angle2(1)       = 0
   degauss         = 0.001
   ecutwfc         = 100
   ibrav           = 0
   input_dft       = 'pbe'
   lspinorb        = .true.
   lforcet         = .true.
   nat             = 1
   nbnd            = 14
   noncolin        = .true.
   nosym           = .true.
   ntyp            = 1
   occupations     = 'smearing'
   smearing        = 'gauss'
   starting_magnetization(1) = 1
   tot_charge      = 2
/
&ELECTRONS
   conv_thr        = 1e-07
/

ATOMIC_SPECIES
   Re 186.2 Re.rel-pz-spn-rrkjus_psl.1.0.0.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS bohr
   Re      -1.66168343      -0.00000189       0.00000756
K_POINTS automatic
   1 1 1  0 0 0
CELL_PARAMETERS bohr
        18.89726133       0.00000000       0.00000000
         0.00000000      18.89726133       0.00000000
         0.00000000       0.00000000      18.89726133
HUBBARD atomic
U Re-5d 4
Notice, that between step 1 and 2 parameters in the &CONTROL and &SYSTEM cards 
are different and step 1 uses a scalar relativistic potential, while step 2 
uses full relativistic potential from pslibrary.

Step 1 completes successfully, but the step 2 gives the following error:
     Error in routine read_scf (1):
     Reading ldaU ns
I used QE 7.4 to run these calculations. Both step 1 and step 2 are completed 
without any error if I use PBE only (no hubbard-U).

I am suspecting that the error is because in the NSCF-SOC calculation expects a 
Hubbard calculation manifold double in size (10x10 in noncollinear vs 5x5 in 
collinear in d-orbitals).

I am not sure if there are any fundamental reasons why the force theorem would 
not work in DFT+U formalism, because the above examples work when Hubbard-U is 
disabled (PBE only).

[1] 
https://gitlab.com/QEF/q-e/-/blob/f184591e9f34cfcc7767505a23977a92286e8ba6/PP/examples/ForceTheorem_example/run_example
Best,
Kayahan

Dr. Kayahan Saritas
R&D Associate, Materials Theory Group
Materials Sciences and Technology Division
Oak Ridge National Laboratory

_______________________________________________
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
and economic cooperation amongst peoples
_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to