Hello,

I'm trying to use the PSlib pseudopotentials for an scf calculation on an 
antiferromagnetic material, including spin-orbit, as the materials cloud 
database and quantum espresso website seem to imply these are the best. 
Unfortunately, the absolute magnetization has immediately diverged in every 
computation I've tried, and I'm not sure how to stop it.

Using the pseudodojo pseudopotentials it converges to around 6 bohr/unit cell. 
With the PSlib pseudopotentials even by the first or second iteration it is at 
like 1000 bohr/unit cell, and never recovers from there. I've tried setting 
startingwfc to 'atomic', and this makes the first iteration have a reasonable 
absolute magnetization, but then in the second iteration it already increases 
to like 100 bohr/unit cell and diverges from there. Increasing the mixing beta 
to 0.9, it still diverges very quickly.

The total energy also lowers by hundreds of Ry as the magnetization diverges. 
This happens with both the fully reletavistic PBE and PBEsol pseudopotentials. 
I've also tried modifying input_dft a bit, but the functionals that I've tried 
either aren't compatible with noncolinear spin, or haven't changed the 
divergence.

Does anyone have tips for why this might be diverging so badly, and how to get 
it to converge to a reasonable ground state? I realize I can use the pseudodojo 
potentials, but I'm thinking my bands might not be correct so I want to compare 
how they look for different pseudopotentials.

Best,
Miles Johnson
PhD Candidate in Applied Physics
California Institute of Technology




_______________________________________________________________________________
The Quantum ESPRESSO Foundation stands in solidarity with all civilians 
worldwide who are victims of terrorism, military aggression, and indiscriminate 
warfare.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to