Dear QE developers,
I am trying to understand the meaning of “orbital-resolved magnetic 
anisotropy”as demonstrated in: PP/examples/ForceTheorem_example.
>From the documentation and the projwfc.x output, it appears that QE 
>providesthe contribution of each orbital character (e.g., dxy, dx2−y2, dz2, …) 
>to theband-energy difference (MAE) obtained via the force theorem.
Question:Is my understanding correct that QE reports the *projected 
occupied-statecontribution* of a given orbital character (e.g., dxy = 0.9 meV), 
rather thanan explicit second-order SOC coupling term between occupied and 
unoccupiedorbitals (as typically reported in VASP, e.g., dxy|dz2 = 0.3 meV, 
dxy|dx2−y2 = 0.4 meV, …)?
In other words, if VASP reports:   dxy|dz2   = 0.3 meV   dxy|dx2−y2 = 0.4 meV   
dxy|dyz   = 0.2 meV
then the QE-projected value:   dxy = 0.9 meV
would correspond to the *sum of all pairwise contributions* involving dxy as 
theoccupied partner. Could you please confirm whether projwfc.x computes 
thisprojection only from occupied states, and whether this interpretation is 
correct?
Thank you very much.
_______________________________________________________________________________
The Quantum ESPRESSO Foundation stands in solidarity with all civilians 
worldwide who are victims of terrorism, military aggression, and indiscriminate 
warfare.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to