Hi John/Gordon,

Thank you for the feedback and the warm welcome.

I'm pleased you confirmed my suspicions. While I use CentOS day in day out,
I must say I've never dealt with an issue like this so I wanted to tread
carefully.

Gordon: I believe I've updated my email address on the list so this message
should sail through...

Adrian

On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 9:51 PM, John Cooper <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Adrian,
>
> The gui-0.3 image should include the fix to eliminate the file
> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-**persistent-net.rules
>
> If it hasn't I've slipped up - I've just checked and I have - sorry!
> It is correctly removed on the cli-0.3 image.
>
> It was an earlier bug I fixed (and then appear to have unfixed).
>
> To work around it, when you boot up just delete 
> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-**persistent-net.rules
> and then reboot and it should come up as eth0.
>
> I'll update the image and correct this.
>
>
> Thanks very much for the feedback.
>
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
> On 16/06/12 18:50, Adrian Hardy wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> First of all, I'd like to congratulate all those involved on this
>> project. I couldn't believe my luck when I found that someone had ported my
>> favourite distro to ARM.
>>
>> Cutting to the chase: immediately after burning the latest image
>> (gui-0.3) to an SD and popping it into my RasPi, an ifconfig shows that no
>> network adapters (other than lo) are
>> available. During boot, it says that udev has renamed eth0 to eth1. Then,
>> when networking tries to start, it says it can't find the device called
>> eth0.
>>
>> I'm not a sysadmin by any stretch of the imagination, but I believe it's
>> because if you cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-**persistent-net.rules, the
>> network device is defined twice. I fixed
>> this by creating ifcfg-eth1, but I think the proper fix would be to
>> remove the duplicate adapter definition.
>>
>> Is it worth documenting this or even changing the image? Does any of this
>> make sense, or am I embarrassing myself on my debut post?
>>
>> Thanks again,
>>
>> Adrian
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.redsleeve.org/**mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.redsleeve.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.redsleeve.org/**mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.redsleeve.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.redsleeve.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to