On 04/09/2015 12:25 AM, Mark Campbell wrote: > Long time EL user/sys admin here (though historically I don't do much > packaging). Is the disk space your biggest concern with doing it this > way? Just from my humble point of view, I'd think that having > separate branches vs "just updates" won't show much difference in the > beginning (yum update should work effectively identically either way), > but as time goes on, provided you intend to keep moving up the version > tree, it may make it harder (and/or more messy) in the long run. If > nothing else, it would offer smaller flexibility for those that want > to stick with a previous minor version. > > On a somewhat related topic, per our email this morning, I decided to > go ahead and try a build out of RSEL 7 to upgrade the rpi2 kernel, and > I noticed that RSEL 7 doesn't come with any yum repos enabled. Is > there a yum repo existing for RSEL 7 yet? > At the time I made the redsleeve-release rpm I had no clue how and where the yum repo would be, so there is no yum configuration in there.
That being said, you should be able to create a /etc/yum-repos.d/RedSleeve.repo with content like: [Redsleeve_alpha] name=RSEL7 alpha repo baseurl=http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/ftp.redsleeve.org/pub/el7/alpha/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 [Redsleeve_alpha_updates] name=RSEL7 alpha updates repo baseurl=http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/ftp.redsleeve.org/pub/el7/alpha-updates enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 We have not yet automated the upload process to here, so a little more up-to-date things (including the 7.1 work-in-progress) can be found here: ftp://jacco.ligthart.nu/Redsleeve7/ Jacco _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.redsleeve.org/mailman/listinfo/users
