On 06/01/2015 08:30 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote: > On 2015-06-01 19:05, Jacco Ligthart wrote: >> On 05/31/15 17:17, Gordan Bobic wrote: >>> On 31/05/15 16:12, Gordan Bobic wrote: >>>> Jacco, >>>> >>>> I think I just found a bug - the epel-release package points at >>>> upstream >>>> Fedora which is x86 only. The repo file should probably pointing at >>>> ftp.redsleeve.org (or better a mirror file listing our mirrors, >>>> same as >>>> our other repositories). >>> >>> Aaand I just found the updated fixed epel-release package under >>> updates. >>> >>> Right, I'm not touching anything further until an appropriate amount >>> of coffee has been consumed, I'm clearly not firing on all cylinders. >> >> hmm, I was not aware that I also build the epel-release package normally >> present in epel :) >> I sort of builded all that was there, blindly :) >> >> I'll remove this one. > > I would also like to propose keeping the $repo-release packages in the > base repository, like Scientific Linux does. That way running straight > from the base image you can: > > # yum install epel-release > # yum install $some-epel-package
That is exactly as it is now. there is an epel-release in 7.1-extras, which is now part of the base repo. Jacco _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.redsleeve.org/mailman/listinfo/users
