[email protected] wrote: > Le jeudi 1 septembre 2011 21:19, Yury V. Zaytsev a écrit : >> I don't see a problem with updating nettle from 2.1 to 2.2. Let me see >> if it's easy enough so that I can do it now. >> >> However, I do see a problem with packaging gnutls. We have a very old >> gnutls for RHEL2/3, but newer RHELs ship newer gnutls and I don't feel >> like maintaining an RFX-only backport... >> >> Out of interest, what is your use case? > > the nettle 2.2 is > the only problem is difficult solved to yum dependency > the nettle 2.2 is not present is the depot only 2.1 > No, it is 2.2.1, not the 2.1 !!
-- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.repoforge.org/mailman/listinfo/users
