Now that you mentioned it, I do remember the problems with the initial beta Gmail. Until you get the work around coded, I'll just add a reminder to the login page for my users, asking them to please use the navigation icons, and not to use back/forward or mouse gestures/keyboard shortcuts.
 
Guess I need to find some books on AJAX for spring break reading...
 
Thanks Thomas...

 
On 3/20/06, Thomas Bruederli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To make the browser's back/forward buttons work is a challenge to each
AJAX-driven web application. Remember Gmail had the same problem in
their first beta and now they fixed it. It's possible to fake the
browser history in order to get correct _javascript_ calls every time the
user clicks on those buttons. It's on my todo-list to implement a work
around that enables the correct behavior of the browser history.

Just note that we are aware of that problem and it will be fixed.

Regards,
Thomas


Dan Schaper wrote:
> One thing I've noticed, if I use the RoundCube navigation icons, then
> all of the problems with messages appearing not to move, or not being
> deleted, then things go smooth and accurate. Also the hourglass notice
> at the top-center of the page always displays. However, if I use the
> forwards/backwards navigation of my webbrowser (IE at the moment.), then
> the message list display does not always update, nor do I get the
> top-center update display.
>
> Haven't coded HTML or JS in ages, but is there a way to prevent usage of
> the browsers navigation shortcuts, and force the use of RC's icons for
> navigation? Or perhaps the login screen should have a say something like
> "Please use the navigation icons within RoundCube, do not use your
> browsers forward or reverse features"?
>
> Layman's guess, but when using the browsers forward/reverse, then the JS
> functions do not always trigger, and the browser is caching the main
> display page, and not showing a current view. And yes, Cache is set to
> false, but would a pragma no-cache prevent the browser from loading a
> stale page?
>
> --
> Dan Schaper



--
Dan Schaper

Reply via email to