On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:25:34 -0700 (PDT), Jason Fesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> That's nifty. WHat list software are you using (name and version, please) >> to do that? > > I am using: > http://detach.optimism.cc > http://scifi.squawk.com/demime.html > http://www.list.org/ (older 2.1.x; will upgrade when 3.x is "real") > > It is detach that is doing the attachment removal. > > demime, is reducing the leftover message to simple clean plain text > (using HTML/RTF, if needed and found, to get plain text).
Nifty. >> Also, please set the list to reply to list and have the 'to' address be the >> list instead of the poster. If I didn't have very smart procmail recipes >> this message would have 1) been dumped as certain spam and 2) not been >> recognized as a list message. There's the "List-Id" header to check which list the message is from. I use that header in my Sieve rules, and Dovecot does a dang fine job at it. > "Reply-to:" matches the previous list, based on the archives. I'm not too > keen on changing that immediately without a *huge* majority of the users > here indicating that is the way it should be. > > If there is enough demand, I'll set up some kind of vote thing, so as to > keep the traffic off-list. But, in the meantime, I'm trying, to the > extent possible, to match the previous list behavior, and minimize > suprises. There has been discussion on this on a thread started by myself about adding a button/action to roundcube, and I have actually come to agree about that it shold not be used, though, who uses "reply-to" these days? I don't really mind if it goes or stays. -- Elisamuel Resto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Source Mage GNU/Linux / http://sourcemage.org ID: 0x18615F19 / FP: B66D 1C2A E8EE B922 1D9C D98F D2D5 FB61 1861 5F19 _______________________________________________ RoundCube users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users
