On 11/09/2012 12:16 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: > 1) Click on "Reply to sender": The reply goes to "[email protected]" > only (as there is no real name given, this address is obviously taken from > the Reply-To: or Mail-Reply-To: header), but not to the list. This behaviour > is wrong, IMHO.
Roundcube uses Mail-Reply-To header as Thunderbird does and I think this is ok, because Mail-Reply-To has precedence. > 2) Click on "Reply to list or to sender and all recipients": The reply goes > to "[email protected]" only (as there is no real name given, this > address might probably be taken from the X-Original-To: header), but not to > the sender. This behaviour is wrong again, IMHO. > > 3) Select "Reply all" from the options of the "Reply to list or to sender > and all recipients" button: The reply goes to "[email protected]" > (obviously taken from the Reply-To: or Mail-Reply-To: header) and in Cc: to > "RoundCube Mailingliste <[email protected]>" (definitely taken from > the To: header). This behaviour is more confusing than wrong, anyway it does > still not reflect the content of the Reply-To: header and the addresses are > taken from different headers. > > 4) Select "Reply list" from the options of the "Reply to list or to sender > and all recipients" button: The reply goes to "[email protected]" > only (as there is no real name given, this address might probably be taken > from the X-Original-To: header), but not to the sender. This behaviour may > be considered as correct, although even this could still be arguable as > well. And I'm wondering why the recipient is taken from the X-Original-To: > header (rather than from the To: header). For me it's consistent and Thunderbird does exactly the same. > I believe it should be reconsidered which headers should be respected and > take precedence in which scenario. At least in scenarios 1) to 3) above the > content of the Reply-To: header should be respected, IMHO. > > Furthermore I'm wondering what the purpose of the Mail-Reply-To: header is > and why it is created at all. Generally spoken, from my point of view > standard RFC headers (To:, Cc:, Reply-To:, probably Sender:) should take > precedence over non-standard headers such as Mail-Reply-To: or http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html -- Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak LAN Management System Developer [http://lms.org.pl] Roundcube Webmail Developer [http://roundcube.net] --------------------------------------------------- PGP: 19359DC1 @@ GG: 2275252 @@ WWW: http://alec.pl _______________________________________________ Roundcube Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users
