Great news, 

where and how I can help/donate? 

W dniu 22.02.2013 19:11, Thomas Bruederli napisał(a): 

> Good news, folks :-) please read below.
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Chris Moules <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [RCD] [RCU] RoundCube Calendar
> To: Roundcube Development discussion mailing list <[email protected]>
> Cc: Thomas Bruederli <[email protected]>
> 
> On 14/02/13 10:00, Thomas Bruederli wrote:
> 
>> Nieścierowicz Adam wrote: 
>> 
>>> So when looking through google, I found resources on the stand AGPL license 
>>> client thought that maybe someone is willing to finish on AGPL license.
>> The calendar module provided by Kolab is under APGL but currently lacks a 
>> CalDAV backend. There are plans to add this but the work for that isn't 
>> scheduled yet. 
>> 
>>> Personally, I am ready to sponsor a programmer, maybe others willing to 
>>> help?
>> I could connect you with the programmers who announced their intents to add 
>> CalDAV to the Kolab calendar module. Or maybe they're even listening on this 
>> list (therefore cc-ing the dev list). Regards, Thomas
> 
> Hello,
> 
> we at GMS (http://www.gms.lu/ [1] - https://github.com/GMS-SA/ [2])are the
> company Thomas hinted at who are working on CalDAV and CardDAV support.
> 
> The Calendar support is implemented by extending the Kolab plugin(s). A
> CalDAV driver is being implemented for calendar and tasklist plugins.
> 
> The CardDAV support is being implemented as a new and independent plugin
> as the Kolab addressbook is completely different and does not support
> backend 'drivers'.
> 
> Our CalDAV implementation is using the SabreDAV
> (http://code.google.com/p/sabredav/ [3]) and the sabre-vobject
> (https://github.com/evert/sabre-vobject [4]) Libraries.
> 
> In both cases our target CalDAV/CardDAV server is SOGo
> (http://www.sogo.nu/ [5]). Development is trying to stay as RFC complaint as
> possible. There are cases, however, where SOGo diverges from the RFC or
> the RFCs were published later than features were implemented in SOGo. In
> such cases it is planned to have config options for server support so
> that this does not become a SOGo plugin. Our main focus is SOGo as this
> is what we are using.
> 
> Work is well underway. Most functionality is implemented but there is
> still lots to do before a release is expected. We are not talking years
> but probably over 1 month.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Chris
> 
> P.S.
> Thomas, if you wish to re-post this to the 'users' list, to which I am
> not subscribed, please feel free.
> _______________________________________________
> Roundcube Development discussion mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev [6]
> _______________________________________________
> Roundcube Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users [7]

 

Links:
------
[1] http://www.gms.lu/
[2] https://github.com/GMS-SA/
[3] http://code.google.com/p/sabredav/
[4] https://github.com/evert/sabre-vobject
[5] http://www.sogo.nu/
[6] http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
[7] http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Roundcube Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to