Bill McGonigle wrote: > For the future, would it make sense to point the mirrorlist locally by > default, and then rev. the -release package when there was a change to > the list? > > If that's not a good idea, one of us with an account on a big managed > server farm (e.g. Yahoo!) could volunteer to host the mirrorlist file - > it's small enough. The theory there being that it wouldn't be impacted > by a single hardware incident, at least not for too long.
I am presently working with Dag on this issue - with the aim being to have a slightly more robust apt.sw.be setup in place. - KB -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users
