-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Brandon Amaro wrote:
| I reported this problem a month ago and it hasn't been fixed. The only
| solution I can think of to install it is to download the rpm and install
| it using the force option.

Hmmm. I am rather against the use of the --force option.
Suppose we start to accept that "make love --force" is viable option. To
me that sounds just about as bad an idea.

And I have no realy need to replace the particular package. For this one
I will just wait and see.

I tackled the conflict of perl-IO on my Centos 5 machine by creating a
better package ;-)

Hugo.

- --
[EMAIL PROTECTED]               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

        A: Yes.
        >Q: Are you sure?
        >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
        >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIigpVBvzDRVjxmYERAu9hAKCfyodENh51m/GRSZp2m1ymiqynCwCeMUw4
b9D1so96iuTikEJ/LpJ2/hI=
=CNwF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to