On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Hugo van der Kooij < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Christoph Maser wrote: > > Hi Hugo > > > > I have a spec file ready to release. I was just wondering if we should > > announce it 1-2 Weeks in advance here. > > I was wondering if it should be released as nagios-3.0.4 package or > nagios3-3.0.4 package. > > The latter one would not cause an overwrite without a deliberate action > on the user end. > > Hugo. > > - -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/ > PGP/GPG <http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/PGP/GPG>? Use: > http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc > > A: Yes. > >Q: Are you sure? > >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? > > Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFI92RtBvzDRVjxmYERAv3bAJ9J1VJ7QY4sPoK3wEMhORGfHxsETACfZtNe > R1GJmAPavClxmRlR8wX63FA= > =Q156 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users > Hi, I would opt for the nagios3-3.0.4 variant - gives everybody the chance for "opting-in" to the new version if and when he likes to. just my 2c, __ /homas
_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users
