Worked like charm. Evolution 2.12 up. Thanks everyone on the list who contributed. I hope I can make myself useful for the future.
-----Original Message----- From: Yury V. Zaytsev [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 11:31 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [users] evolution RPM for RHEL5 Hi, I am not familiar with RHEL offerings, but I am pretty sure that you must have freaked up your set up. I see no reason for RH to supply evolution-dataserver w/o offering Evolution as well. Other than that, you clearly didn't look attentively enough for the CentOS RPMs I mentioned earlier. http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/os/i386/CentOS/ -- Sincerely yours, Yury V. Zaytsev On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 20:23 -0700, [email protected] wrote: > I looked around for CentOS RPMs but couldn't find them > I found RPMs under Fedora's 6 archive here: > http://archives.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/core/6/i386/os/Fe dora/RPMS/evolution-2.8.0-7.fc6.i386.rpm > but the RPM install failed with the following dependancies: > > gnome-pilot >= 2.0.13 is needed by evolution-2.8.0-7.fc6.i386 > gnome-spell >= 1.0.2 is needed by evolution-2.8.0-7.fc6.i386 > libgpilotd.so.2 is needed by evolution-2.8.0-7.fc6.i386 > libgpilotdcm.so.2 is needed by evolution-2.8.0-7.fc6.i386 > libgpilotdconduit.so.2 is needed by evolution-2.8.0-7.fc6.i386 > libgtkhtml-3.8.so.15 is needed by evolution-2.8.0-7.fc6.i386 > libpisock.so.8 is needed by evolution-2.8.0-7.fc6.i386 > libpisync.so.0 is needed by evolution-2.8.0-7.fc6.i386 > spamassassin is needed by evolution-2.8.0-7.fc6.i386 > > The one dependancy I'm worried about is libgtkhtml, as even when building > evolution 2.10 from source and seeing the libgtkthml 3.14 so there, it > would still say it doesn't see it. I guess I don't have the .pc file > required by the build, but then I don't have the source for libgtkhtml to > build it > > The reason I considered FC6 is because I found on the RHEL5 CDs lots of > RPMs for FC6 included ,so I thought evolution for FC6 would be the closest > match > But if there are other options, please let me know > > > On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 18:55 -0700, [email protected] wrote: > > > >> I wouldn't be writing here if I wasn't deseparat > >> So my question is: > >> - does anyone have an RPM for GTK+2 2.26 > >> - does anyone have an RPM for evolution? > > > > How come the official CentOS RPMs doesn't work for you? > > > > -- > > Sincerely yours, > > Yury V. Zaytsev > > > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users
